From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-wg0-f47.google.com (mail-wg0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D612200B1B
	for <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Wed, 23 May 2012 17:19:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wgbfa7 with SMTP id fa7so6372642wgb.28
	for <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Wed, 23 May 2012 17:19:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
	:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer;
	bh=NCLMs4uFlrROGljiaFt5Vm9yw1rqhIiDigvonQKgQ74=;
	b=PaCrR00INJJT1ZTkxzxR4aZ62yAvGogxTgwfdSR/PvGXvy5NZ3t4EtOG8pSdtgOpf9
	LA2+rq7GvoCHCrnxsypLAJ240efhKr4PDDoiWTXJ+cKqryeZ73Qbw7mrFt5m+wH5fK3Y
	ErR0au+K/9Jm5YCA3LePXSc7xZRqDrnXNF0+mLmCsZkVKDEoWzyv7Af1HKuGyIB5oAV8
	HKAz9KcpkUkwJEdp77dFtteRpSaEAu2Un/gXc5oJkQ0krzIaVqEFP/BVnMRSszzzrRpX
	5Nd065n0t2m+5hWqSTlRXMbBN0+FhsNNb8u7zeeIdNqPgEUO8YkrfPNjN+wTPC/RcqPs
	pW9Q==
Received: by 10.180.98.201 with SMTP id ek9mr50635277wib.7.1337818756792;
	Wed, 23 May 2012 17:19:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.239.204] (xdsl-83-150-84-172.nebulazone.fi.
	[83.150.84.172])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fm1sm43662541wib.10.2012.05.23.17.19.15
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
	Wed, 23 May 2012 17:19:15 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <657665493.17619813.1337817619225.JavaMail.root@zm07.stanford.edu>
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 03:19:13 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <91F92BEA-BE41-4CE6-BE67-F41A2C58EA40@gmail.com>
References: <657665493.17619813.1337817619225.JavaMail.root@zm07.stanford.edu>
To: Rishita Rajal Anubhai <rishita@stanford.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: cs244-spr1112-staff@lists.stanford.edu, amoghvk@stanford.edu,
	codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Codel] CoDel + 3.3 kernel
X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions <codel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/codel>
List-Post: <mailto:codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 00:19:19 -0000


On 24 May, 2012, at 3:00 am, Rishita Rajal Anubhai wrote:

> The problem now is, while trying to 'make' from the codel
> repo (to run tc), all the other packages I need such as flex,=20
> bison, etc. all seem to require the older version (libc6 2.13*)=20
> to be installed. Is the expected next step, to install all the
> required packages manually in some way?

That sounds like a pretty broken distro to me.  Glibc spends a huge =
amount of effort on ABI backwards compatibility, so having a newer =
version of it should not break binaries built for an older version.

 - Jonathan Morton