From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wg0-f47.google.com (mail-wg0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D388D201B52; Wed, 9 May 2012 08:47:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wgbfa7 with SMTP id fa7so373048wgb.28 for ; Wed, 09 May 2012 08:47:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3t6K2oxGTarpLaW2pOB3Vmg7zhGwZ1vH75CN71JUWew=; b=mM6WzXdGVzBT3ltTdx4gAaoz6WL6fw+/yRY5Wa9HrbKRPKsvWjKvOCnzDRyDxS2rF/ C2OTJmhcNTw1o0b9sjC2lEtIWPWTvpVnRlU7xy4jHOYGKhB06iLJLvZkxczj51RXs6K9 QCJ7bmTTz4s+EmJW7FdO/9RpkQYAT+Y363+Ns93dysVmyGIoaK9iOFit0DlPT8CSc79I VzVzvxu+HnRMOqRMvFxR6JhZvOj0uvDFXWA71zaTGFp+rmUWMCCVn9c4Szgqsc5YIPrC 57Bu1SE33UTLmORybIwXIrG7sCOH20Wj9jwHpT8RxHLVgggW/GgBM1MNh7u9+nyCr/gC dUGg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.105.69 with SMTP id gk5mr9243736wib.3.1336578450586; Wed, 09 May 2012 08:47:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.112.66 with HTTP; Wed, 9 May 2012 08:47:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1336571439.12504.27.camel@edumazet-glaptop> References: <1336368957-17586-1-git-send-email-dave.taht@bufferbloat.net> <1336399043.3752.2318.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <1336571439.12504.27.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 08:47:30 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Eric Dumazet Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net, bloat , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dave_T=E4ht?= Subject: Re: [Codel] [PATCH v12] codel: Controlled Delay AQM X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2012 15:47:33 -0000 Doing (or leveraging) the timestamp on actual ingress to the system, rather than entrance to the exiting queue, more accurately will compensate for overall system loading and the overhead of traversing 3+ pages of function calls to get it from the entrance point to the exit, and should result in 'tighter' results. --=20 Dave T=E4ht SKYPE: davetaht US Tel: 1-239-829-5608 http://www.bufferbloat.net