From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: [Codel] hardware multiqueue in fq_codel?
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:09:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw5SBtsz3=L9M7mhASg9oAVyvysFL9VNwc-52mOk4HWg8A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In my default environments (wifi, mainly) the hardware queues have
very different properties.
I'm under the impression that in at least a few ethernet devices they
are essentially the same. That said, in the sch_mq case, an entirely
separate qdisc is created per hardware queue, and it's always been
puzzling to me as to how to attempt to use them within a single qdisc
in the pull-through manner.
logically, you should be able to take the fq_codel hash index (idx %
dev->num_tx_queues) and spread out across the hardware queues that
way, but I have no idea where that info would go (the skb? the flow?)
or even if it were possible as per the pull through problem...
(This does not mean that I necessarily think hardware multiqueues are
a good idea... (certainly the results I get out of 802.11e are
terrible - but it would be nice to have a unified solution for hw
multiqueue devices)
--
Dave Täht
Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html
next reply other threads:[~2013-07-11 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-11 17:09 Dave Taht [this message]
2013-07-11 17:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-11 18:06 ` Dave Taht
2013-07-11 18:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-11 21:18 ` Dave Taht
2013-07-12 0:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-12 0:48 ` Dave Taht
2013-07-12 9:34 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-07-12 15:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-12 16:36 ` Sebastian Moeller
2013-07-12 16:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-12 17:00 ` Dave Taht
2013-07-15 13:40 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-07-15 13:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-15 14:24 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-07-15 15:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-15 17:19 ` Dave Taht
2013-07-12 16:37 ` Dave Taht
2013-07-12 16:39 ` Dave Taht
2013-07-12 16:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-12 16:54 ` Dave Taht
2013-07-12 17:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-12 17:35 ` Dave Taht
2013-07-12 17:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-12 18:06 ` Dave Taht
2013-07-15 12:56 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-07-12 17:32 ` luca.muscariello
2013-07-11 19:41 ` Jonathan Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/codel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAA93jw5SBtsz3=L9M7mhASg9oAVyvysFL9VNwc-52mOk4HWg8A@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=codel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox