From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com (mail-wi0-f175.google.com [209.85.212.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BFA3200BE8 for ; Fri, 4 May 2012 17:01:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wibhn6 with SMTP id hn6so1670008wib.10 for ; Fri, 04 May 2012 17:01:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=k1jhs77ZEakHcc7uDGDnNQn71iWjM12xz3iP07ttJy4=; b=Y4DFygm5VZu+PAIdFSXtxWn0m1tpyOdCxQ6Ezo5Kn3g+JpZ21uONj6rVNv8pWIe1Hg xCuGfFt2dXx3/mcfYehy9z1yFjTwkjJCvm2GxkVsS3P3dlhHHhum8XP2Yw2eO7z81h7Z 2XuLoanPYJ4+3gCd80O7O3+V1LrtNT/5prxSVqT7KXe8CSHev19bk9lyZ6YulQieqXUH KtYpIlpL6B2TTeVDKgZA4FM8AoN4zvpR4gsCLanckDGDj6mcoWPdDZy2XfH/Pxs5ijZ+ p8ERzhk0sl/+pPKTGDPhjvOtYgRCVuWqeX23qc3csV2oRmUfCLNZh1oAQMxeqnksk/30 WZjw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.100.230 with SMTP id fb6mr19568284wib.3.1336176064056; Fri, 04 May 2012 17:01:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.112.66 with HTTP; Fri, 4 May 2012 17:01:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FA46971.4000702@pollere.com> References: <4FA3F248.3070101@freedesktop.org> <4FA3F50D.7080406@freedesktop.org> <1336146993.3752.354.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <4FA46971.4000702@pollere.com> Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 17:01:03 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Kathleen Nichols Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Codel] fp sqrt vis int sqrt? X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 May 2012 00:01:07 -0000 On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Kathleen Nichols wrot= e: > > Take a deep breath. ok. > > On 5/4/12 10:44 AM, Dave Taht wrote: > >>> >>> That's assuming a 100ms target, which by observation over the >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^interval >> >> past >>> year is not what a typical tcp stream is like anymore, it's closer to >>> 50ms, particularly for elephants and cdns, less in many cases. >>> > > But that really isn't going to make much difference. Interval is *loosely= * > related to RTT. yes. But I have got some nice results with codel + qfq, between crashes.... > >>>> >>>> And I would have liked to been able to to fiddle with target (for >>>> wireless) on the fly as a function of (active_stations), with interval >>>> slaved to minstrel's idea of everything. > > Might be good to know what problem you are exploring before you > fiddle. Well, we went into the special issues wireless has in the meeting. and at the same time, I'm very pleased with what I've been able to see of codel so far. And am trying to keep it simple... just head buzzing with ideas for later. > > _______________________________________________ > Codel mailing list > Codel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel --=20 Dave T=E4ht SKYPE: davetaht US Tel: 1-239-829-5608 http://www.bufferbloat.net