From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-il1-x135.google.com (mail-il1-x135.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C51313CB35 for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 13:42:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-il1-x135.google.com with SMTP id j10so7013241ilu.2 for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 10:42:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1ejKsldycAPnRJktwSkW3Gj8s5tNXu3YD+MSkMFPMds=; b=D8Wqwrv3QhfXu1XaAossgzdjO1oYloQhctEUKzudWblQ1dP0MKXHC6SsHP7Cv0263t GfTI8rWeOL8rJQ041EqQ/ZOpdLo8vyxNTQ9LLauCegqByX3L3xFo9LkyCHDFZFWyEJOn dPsyjpcwgHfrxKKIs81jlPwsy6UFsYjWGKQef8+05mqSYJhdWEx0fR+siKYc0JOiv4Fy nIZ9yYCxVNNON2W339ds+odWC+jJ9Ni6KWKOKMK6h0QhcBPqcYL8Sjv3tHAAHKVFNuQY vzwhAqFaQyg+oUkZYppONDLmQKcBZtYhOBVjtAr68vOfaSG95im56lYJQOHXxv/SX4q+ XYNw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=1ejKsldycAPnRJktwSkW3Gj8s5tNXu3YD+MSkMFPMds=; b=IgPUe5yGdALT64Kxj++Kj7xQNaN4tj+QRMjVGz8PAY326toLPMlk9Sg0gydniAxkYc Bd0BxGqJROBTXyD/y9ns3tz44k9rgqjFErc0nkvkCQ3BUiOp4l0srbFoGbPBpOXRaiXF RrpFFX31G+JJdEj5IalDCzsZfADCncpizQqNrSdiGlJaQI1Neu75jxCsn1UIS2lPhfIw Sn/yevN0g7NrpC1Owr2jSxSh81XUsTSg0c10z+MOcKb+I4H2BAthGJlODEsx6eg/iaTR bCMcZ80MLGAUfp6kfWF3DqPkIVfh5W9BB2UVJTq4xS22chGRqCVmNWlWVcJWx1h2bE08 6xGQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531kavF15QHiK3jy5024cA1UcEhFIOMtSZjiqar45Fg9OSRMjm1u VOcX+lGIV8W4e36mTcee8qFEdT64biqEH4uJHuUE8gCsfBM= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwb6L4mJJ0UD2o06xdwPtnL9Wg+HdXWmD5b7oxnZysrut+YDj1CwmUGHEkfi6uwAOFW/GQOUWpRQ/eNi+VmhIE= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:12e4:: with SMTP id l4mr7594171iln.25.1635097352920; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 10:42:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Dave Taht Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 10:42:20 -0700 Message-ID: To: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [Codel] code review: openbsd codel implementation X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 17:42:33 -0000 I've been beginning to worry that multiple implementations have been getting the drop scheduler incorrect for codel. The openbsd implementation caps the count at 400: https://github.com/openbsd/src/blob/2207c4325726fdc5c4bcd0011af0fdf7d3dab13= 7/sys/net/fq_codel.c#L263 --=20 Fixing Starlink's Latencies: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Dc9gLo6Xrwgw Dave T=C3=A4ht CEO, TekLibre, LLC