CoDel AQM discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Cc: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Codel] [Bloat] Linux-able modems
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 14:36:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw6g0sUPuE2pa7xdv8=U8GTS+df55qEpOVT8rPmFLsvjfw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <167A9DFB-CC98-47C5-B4B9-25A11189AA44@gmail.com>

On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 14 May, 2012, at 4:55 pm, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
>>> So I repeat my question: where can I reliably go and buy a DSL modem
>>> that I can put Linux on?  It probably helps to mention that I'm in
>>> Finland, so a European (or at least British) reseller is preferable.
>>
>> If the Geos or Solos are too expensive, I'd be looking for other ADSL
>> devices supported by OpenWrt. Probably Lantiq-based. The Netgear
>> DGN3500B perhaps (see recent traffic on openwrt-devel).
>
> The 3700 is back-ordered by weeks, and the 3800 doesn't have a modem, and the 3500 isn't even in the local catalogues.  Netgear doesn't seem to be well regarded over here, even by the hacker types - and you *know* we have hacker types aplenty.
>
> I double-checked all my hardware again, and while I can technically get OpenWRT on my D-Link modem, it can't actually drive the *modem* part because Broadcom is mean and stingy.
>
> After biting the bullet and going through the local retailers' catalogues with a fine-toothed comb, I eventually found this - a fine specimen as far as hardware specs goes:
>
> http://www.jimms.fi/tuote/WBMR-HP-G300H-EU
>
> It happens to be Lantiq based, and so OpenWRT shows full support for it:
>
> http://wiki.openwrt.org/toh/buffalo/wbmr-hp-g300h
>
> Jimm's is transitioning to a purely mail order system and is based in a different city, but it turned out that my local megahypersuperretailer had just got a batch in stock, so I got one from there.
>
> Well, this should be fun.

As noted elsewhere, fq_codel is now the default qos system in openwrt
as of build 31761

http://buildbot.openwrt.org:8010/one_line_per_build

37 arches, 150 platforms, no waiting.

There are still a few patches left to land, and it doesn't turn it on
on the wireless or ethernet by default, although it should definitely
do so, in the case of the latter, and well, it helps a bit on
wireless, too, although major surgery on the stack remains to get it
right.

And codel + QFQ remains interesting.

I look forward to hearing about your results.

>  - Jonathan Morton
>



-- 
Dave Täht
SKYPE: davetaht
US Tel: 1-239-829-5608
http://www.bufferbloat.net

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-18 21:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-09  1:04 [Codel] The challenge Dave Taht
2012-05-09  2:02 ` [Codel] [Bloat] " Kevin Gross
2012-05-09  3:13 ` [Codel] " Kathleen Nichols
2012-05-09  3:56   ` Dave Taht
2012-05-09  5:16 ` [Codel] [Bloat] " Simon Barber
2012-05-09  5:40   ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-09  5:41     ` Dave Taht
2012-05-09  7:32       ` [Codel] [codel] some numbers on dual 10Gb links Eric Dumazet
2012-05-09 13:04   ` [Codel] [Bloat] The challenge Kevin Gross
2012-05-16  5:55     ` Jonathan Morton
2012-05-16  6:09       ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-16  7:05         ` [Codel] Exploring the potential of codel, fq_codel, and qfq dave taht
2012-05-16  7:20           ` Dave Taht
2012-05-16  7:42             ` [Codel] [Bloat] " Eric Dumazet
2012-05-16  7:46             ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-16  8:17               ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-16  9:02                 ` Jonathan Morton
2012-05-16  9:14                   ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-16  9:31                     ` Jonathan Morton
2012-05-16  9:37                       ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-16  9:59                         ` Jonathan Morton
2012-05-16 10:10                           ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-16 13:58                 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-16 17:40               ` Rick Jones
2012-05-16 17:53                 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-16 17:33             ` [Codel] " Rick Jones
2012-05-16 17:48               ` [Codel] [Bloat] " Eric Dumazet
2012-05-16  6:09       ` [Codel] [Bloat] The challenge Dave Taht
2012-05-16  6:31         ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-16  8:15           ` Jonathan Morton
2012-05-09 19:10   ` Roger Jørgensen
2012-05-09 19:15     ` Dave Taht
2012-05-09 19:28       ` Dave Taht
2012-05-09 20:02     ` Simon Barber
2012-05-09 20:06   ` Fred Baker
2012-05-09 21:47     ` Jim Gettys
2012-05-09 23:58       ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-10  2:34 ` Jonathan Morton
2012-05-10  2:37   ` Dave Taht
2012-05-10  6:35     ` David Woodhouse
2012-05-10  6:54       ` Jonathan Morton
2012-05-10  7:02         ` David Woodhouse
2012-05-10 14:25           ` Justin McCann
2012-05-10 14:42             ` David Woodhouse
2012-05-10 15:34               ` Neil Davies
2012-05-10 21:20               ` Jim Gettys
2012-05-14  7:27           ` Jonathan Morton
2012-05-14  7:34             ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-14 13:55             ` David Woodhouse
2012-05-18 20:56               ` [Codel] [Bloat] Linux-able modems Jonathan Morton
2012-05-18 21:36                 ` Dave Taht [this message]
2012-05-18 22:34                   ` Dave Taht

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/codel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAA93jw6g0sUPuE2pa7xdv8=U8GTS+df55qEpOVT8rPmFLsvjfw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=chromatix99@gmail.com \
    --cc=codel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox