From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io1-xd34.google.com (mail-io1-xd34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E6A43CB35 for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 13:43:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd34.google.com with SMTP id p142so12650801iod.0 for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 10:43:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=wJRcP4mh5K/gcn05rboLdUWmqVbfEpmsL/3OfapV81o=; b=ln8mjSETZuFu5mNgC+UNgilnmfdYgRcbmbKDFk371JEBkAn1yPvVfUPjIy+9C54+Fe 3DH/lUEE0/7AsLuIYMP0XE/H2ExCOfckEut+kGOj1zocvSXmNMdond4asRHuUQRgU9Qp 7rbf/50BjIbbclUNTl0Gp2gPw9aLdbh5nd5FCh2Jx6OVPYNBBXbqHnveCAVbv1xwE6qK QQ/jdC/2t2pewK/Pfh+4QV8bf0R6dvEoyD2fKK+cNU19QUHzqGYGI8S5Qgc6poJBWe1v QsYowBgmR4H32aodJiOTPIzpSUyVEeU8HCsni3WJifFkRRVFPiduLZTuZLwVcmapNfmf GPFw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wJRcP4mh5K/gcn05rboLdUWmqVbfEpmsL/3OfapV81o=; b=tsOlB27L7urxAUy1Pr8Pw3tyxrUxhp1nxwzo+09zFokKvnMhRS4NBAk1oWOIRlA3c3 Xb8uyTsDsg/HcAvn7+pXJblvnWbAexHpMvB5tJTeLDTK4aQI3nGOFOHC7QRfH0ufkMnY WB3112Ci6amYEYpUarQBrB7igyXFCTH+rWRZX5KU9OPBJVOt3qqeW7DGZhec5GqJ4BsP Dr4qUwbi0qwPOU85oRMJt3hZTcNLgKvhXQMsgBwRYIovmQOjDrX8IErwZYaP9EiWlXPk Is2nL4NLolaCcXAylPT5xIhjibFSGsEdgvgq3r15Pk1UftlE/bWK7TaBKyRIhTvr+08V frkA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5303Kjqb7s1kWx81oIMHy8v/+Y/7n61CHf36A/XDekb8ikLS4DV5 dbiaypuqQoMKTLoIcloaWON55cpyq5Uu2E7iBbITgAKmHjg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyH3YlkMRab1jwKIACayXoY6faTZj2qhBx1jHqSlgiatlT21ikIQDL6z1i7o8kOGpv606A2XT378YjU1RsM4uo= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:ce03:: with SMTP id p3mr7633724iob.163.1635097405354; Sun, 24 Oct 2021 10:43:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Dave Taht Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 10:43:13 -0700 Message-ID: To: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Codel] code review: openbsd codel implementation X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2021 17:43:26 -0000 sorry, that was: https://github.com/openbsd/src/blob/2207c4325726fdc5c4bcd0011af0fdf7d3dab13= 7/sys/net/fq_codel.c#L340 On Sun, Oct 24, 2021 at 10:42 AM Dave Taht wrote: > > I've been beginning to worry that multiple implementations have been > getting the drop scheduler incorrect for codel. > > The openbsd implementation caps the count at 400: > > https://github.com/openbsd/src/blob/2207c4325726fdc5c4bcd0011af0fdf7d3dab= 137/sys/net/fq_codel.c#L263 > > -- > Fixing Starlink's Latencies: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Dc9gLo6Xrwg= w > > Dave T=C3=A4ht CEO, TekLibre, LLC --=20 Fixing Starlink's Latencies: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Dc9gLo6Xrwgw Dave T=C3=A4ht CEO, TekLibre, LLC