[Codel] more press...

[Codel] more press...

[Dave Taht]

Jon Corbet does his usual fine job:

http://lwn.net/Articles/496509/

There was also discussion on slashdot, but I shudder at the thought of
suggesting that anyone else here wade through it.

Brahm Cohen went off on RED, without reading the codel paper...

http://bramcohen.com/2012/05/07/tcp-sucks

We have a good feel for what codel will do to ledbat, I'd like to get
something working with FQ that helps...

and

http://apenwarr.ca/log/?m=201205#08

-- 
Dave Täht
SKYPE: davetaht
US Tel: 1-239-829-5608
http://www.bufferbloat.net

Re: [Codel] more press...

[Jim Gettys]

On 05/10/2012 01:43 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
> There was also discussion on slashdot, but I shudder at the thought of
> suggesting that anyone else here wade through it.
>
> Brahm Cohen went off on RED, without reading the codel paper...
>
> http://bramcohen.com/2012/05/07/tcp-sucks
Bram's article came out the day before the CoDel announcement.  So no,
he had had no opportunity to read the paper.  I noticed it since the
traffic to my blog went up a day before I expected it to.

I guess I'll have to do a blog entry to again remind people (and Bram)
that BitTorrent was not (and is not) the villain in the whole network
neutrality mess.  I first did a blog entry about that late in 2010, but
that was before most people knew about bufferbloat.  I wrote it when I
did to help Vint out, who was trying to inject some sanity into
discussions elsewhere; but bufferbloat really took off in a big way in a
posting that occurred a month or so later.

                    - Jim