CoDel AQM discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: avatli@itu.edu.tr
Cc: "codel@lists.bufferbloat.net" <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Codel] Codel on DPDK
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 08:44:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw7JSkEHz=FR1FPp=Ot8XM3xCwH2LOwooZP6juXS9TfrAQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw73+t4cwyMqwxh-M8eooRCcTPxXabp1+zXf4=hJd3o0Dg@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 8:43 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 4:42 AM,  <avatli@itu.edu.tr> wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> I'm trying to implement CoDel-like implementation on Intel's DPDK library,
>> but I have trouble with measuring packet sojourn time on RX/TX queues
>> because of DMA usage. When I call send() function, DPDK puts the packets
>> into DMA-region and I have no idea when the packets sent really into
>> network. Likewise, when I call recv(), I don't have any idea when the
>> packets arrived, so I'm not sure totally but I think I have no chance to
>> measure sojourn time for dma-like implementation. Could you please correct
>> me if I'm wrong. Also any comments/suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
>
> I am under the impression there is a dpdk implementation already, somewhere.

codel, pie, etc, for dpdk: https://git.scc.kit.edu/TM/DPDK_AQM_Switch.git

I have not looked this over for accuracy or completeness.

> As for the amount of time things spend in dma, you are hopefully
> talking about a few mere
> us, and the default for codel is only worrying about ms, so you can do
> the codel work before the send and after the recv.
>
>> Thanks in advance..
>>
>> - Volkan
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Codel mailing list
>> Codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Täht
> Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software!
> http://blog.cerowrt.org



-- 
Dave Täht
Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software!
http://blog.cerowrt.org

      reply	other threads:[~2016-10-18 15:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-18 11:42 avatli
2016-10-18 15:43 ` Dave Taht
2016-10-18 15:44   ` Dave Taht [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/codel.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAA93jw7JSkEHz=FR1FPp=Ot8XM3xCwH2LOwooZP6juXS9TfrAQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=avatli@itu.edu.tr \
    --cc=codel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox