From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-x229.google.com (mail-ob0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1A0C21F30E for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 22:17:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obbgh1 with SMTP id gh1so107155447obb.1 for ; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 22:17:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WHbCeUPZN7gh33Wqd5JKzPEeuOXxX3RIlhVZmYacGYY=; b=DI2Geh/6P0bo9bhkEQ7IFLrsxampVLuwtojsHu49gEUwPe0MFwW+FEoe7RbrmlVd9b 9B8TCTlNrdAK5/s4noW61HMYFdFpT65BLcY8tytDPpUYZgYKv3O0pxU7SzOz++0DBLUq iSJLb1qbkZ/fwi2k+I34BdmkZL5oEWjazSyVY2uJ0vk+7c0V3DcL8W0ZD7vRz+gFdspE hW38gmjTcFgLZuQPptiAZbPl93wmyD2Kt4zIYQ4mBn8QmWoIRWYaskhFF9WcqVvVIR7s ib1J3xBq6McpZeVNtDayozFk7qaG2F1oPbgy7AkBSYGFD01sC+qiuf2suMx/zevvnCxY tNvg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.158.73 with SMTP id ws9mr44907721oeb.24.1427951828408; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 22:17:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.51.66 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 22:17:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <66618FF0-2531-40F2-B296-A9F12A731070@gmail.com> References: <7081A75C-899A-4DB7-8D77-935A37B362D8@gmail.com> <5509957B.30600@pollere.com> <491C7497-BE3E-452B-A797-C7FC1102E7ED@gmail.com> <750FA673-E20D-4D48-9386-097D32CD31FB@gmail.com> <51665FD7-629A-4B8C-B258-2E9AF8E3B5D0@gmx.de> <66618FF0-2531-40F2-B296-A9F12A731070@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2015 22:17:08 -0700 Message-ID: From: Dave Taht To: Jonathan Morton Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "codel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Codel] The next slice of cake X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 05:17:37 -0000 On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Jonathan Morton wro= te: > >> On 30 Mar, 2015, at 22:28, Dave Taht wrote: >> >>> I made a lot of progress over the weekend, and got cake3 running on a s= acrificial box today. No crashes yet! >> >> Preliminary patches always appreciated. I plan to do a build thursday >> for a test cycle this weekend of various things. > > Have a go with this, then. I took the time to do quite a lot of little c= leanup things, such as suppressing the statistics output of classes that ar= e not in use. > > Tests on the Pentium-MMX show similar throughput and latency capabilities= to the first version of cake, but this version has more robust behaviour i= n high-traffic situations - and the Diffserv logic is also far more useful.= I=E2=80=99m working towards getting OProfile running on at least one of m= y desktop-type machines; hopefully it=E2=80=99ll work sufficiently well on = the Pentium-MMX, since that=E2=80=99s the easiest one to drive into saturat= ion. Perf is included in every kernel these days, it is way better than oprofile, and easy to build if you are running natively. in your linux build dir: cd tools make # to get more info > The kernel patch applies on top of the previous one, but the iproute2 pat= ch should apply to stock. Note that the current git version of iproute2 se= ems to have a problem with displaying the stats from an ingress filter. I think for benefit of the audience a fresh patch would be better. I will see if this applies on top of my old patches. > > - Jonathan Morton > --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht Let's make wifi fast, less jittery and reliable again! https://plus.google.com/u/0/107942175615993706558/posts/TVX3o84jjmb