From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sahilgrover013@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-lb0-x243.google.com (mail-lb0-x243.google.com
	[IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::243])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7553221F521
	for <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Sun, 22 Feb 2015 06:26:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by lbjb6 with SMTP id b6so3023474lbj.0
	for <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Sun, 22 Feb 2015 06:26:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
	bh=U24a6egGXdCaVN/moSUqi/467DrhgZV5/Ny/qscDgUA=;
	b=E3n5upMrvPmu6gCF2J2GrfK+6AdhIiDL/H4tIb68DWLkHdgs62HWFQwAvzD4tfXSQ5
	37hOzFGGuC9H/sJ8x+c4B2rc7d30FA3MGla7xdqhMdeJNGYrPeYhOabjcl4prq6j+Ejk
	cJsZ74ytki8HRyxihntJSIv/Gha7tK0YX5RbwLifDRkDbk+Tl4xyh5dQ1CWCUXE58M4g
	lGXh2AawgJt7i2eWwTYxftQMiglaoVc+XrYAdP+nvzbTMk12mabWCb1RJiKcfoj/8EbB
	VGqXy5FYuNrBptHREpfq71khzBmSaroFQ2bXwgyDI7XEiXj7wIAzjBCqU1ZFbSAx7SS1
	q5VQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.198.233 with SMTP id jf9mr6022378lbc.9.1424615162958;
	Sun, 22 Feb 2015 06:26:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.25.147.75 with HTTP; Sun, 22 Feb 2015 06:26:02 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 19:56:02 +0530
Message-ID: <CADnS-2g_UJQUFuwSR2oh3-mENwF-fQUJMJGZH2FHd9arZVe3Tg@mail.gmail.com>
From: sahil grover <sahilgrover013@gmail.com>
To: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c32cf4bad9e9050fae1093
Subject: [Codel] simple tcl script for showing codel is better than RED, ARED,
	DropTail
X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions <codel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/codel>
List-Post: <mailto:codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 14:26:33 -0000

--001a11c32cf4bad9e9050fae1093
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

i want to show codel is better than other aqm.
The script which is given on internet is quite difficult for me.
And i gave a try with simple tcl script but did not get useful results.
Anyone who has worked in this field please provide me simple (with which we
can play easily) code which shows codel is better than RED and other
variants in terms of end to end delay, link utilization and queue occupancy.

Best Regards

--001a11c32cf4bad9e9050fae1093
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>i want to show codel is better than other aqm.</div><=
div>The script which is given on internet is quite difficult for me.</div><=
div>And i gave a try with simple tcl script but did not get useful results.=
</div><div>Anyone who has worked in this field please provide me simple (wi=
th which we can play easily) code which shows codel is better than RED and =
other variants in terms of end to end delay, link utilization and queue occ=
upancy.</div><div><br></div><div>Best Regards</div></div>

--001a11c32cf4bad9e9050fae1093--