From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-la0-x230.google.com (mail-la0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB98B21F41A for ; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 01:14:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by lamq1 with SMTP id q1so33256287lam.9 for ; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 01:14:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=9W439aAL6NRgXMcx8BCeiGiIZ9XrsrWTEMatappqinY=; b=xeLvvLSeyMPw7h8yQiEJAtTRRJghkGtQYkx3zTNdarAt082fAZv5BkBiDr5gu1BGej sf7LE4BNY35C8z0KfVDjR3CnfExEeBXFHoaT0hdTqSlVhg1e5Zr0Q5Sa7582GH7lgrnH 3HXAN+nSB+EcLha4RBnQpunI1Qsmq3HHcBa1YmwqYhWYrjkOYsuF74CiMf4aSMu0d95Z oyOUjMts/PVRjfGGeT4Rv+mVLQ1gliO0B934ySAJPQ6+HvyZ9VJ8nKz+t9WLhwUeM1Wm jWWz4/n2pQZfWl2OJ6iZdeK2obIVjlkvuFrF9C2FXXwapE117dskrPeEzqdAV/psdCcq kG3Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.153.7.100 with SMTP id db4mr12003665lad.9.1425633293599; Fri, 06 Mar 2015 01:14:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.25.147.75 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Mar 2015 01:14:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 14:44:53 +0530 Message-ID: From: sahil grover To: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134730e0b89fb05109b1ed1 Subject: [Codel] suggestions for enhancing AQM X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 09:15:25 -0000 --001a1134730e0b89fb05109b1ed1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi For my research work ,i want to enhance AQM. And i was thinking to improve CoDel by managing UDP flows because it allocates disproportionate share of bandwidth to tcp's when misbehaving UDP flows are there(transmitting data at very high rate). And when i checked with sfq_CoDel,this problem is resolved. It maintains the throughput of tcp's. So can anybody tell me limitations of codel ,sfq_codel so that i can work on it. or any suggestions to make CoDel,Sfq_CoDel even better. Please keep in mind, right now i can work only on ns2. And i want each and everyone to share their ideas ,it would be useful for all please reply. Thanks --001a1134730e0b89fb05109b1ed1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi=C2=A0

For my research work ,i want t= o enhance AQM.

And i was thinking to improve CoDel= by managing UDP flows because it allocates=C2=A0disproportionate share of = bandwidth to tcp's when misbehaving UDP flows are there(transmitting da= ta at very high rate).

And when i checked with sfq= _CoDel,this problem is resolved. It maintains the throughput of tcp's.<= /div>

So can anybody tell me limitations of codel ,sfq_c= odel so that i can work on it.

or any suggestions = to make CoDel,Sfq_CoDel even better.

Please keep i= n mind, right now i can work only on ns2.

And i wa= nt =C2=A0each and everyone to =C2=A0share their ideas ,it would be =C2=A0us= eful for all=C2=A0

please reply.

Thanks

--001a1134730e0b89fb05109b1ed1--