From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-x234.google.com (mail-wi0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0A3921F238 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 09:19:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wizk4 with SMTP id k4so145913591wiz.1 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 09:19:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Fu2YfpyI4LJbL+3n9g1N877JuHV7OUhqXTZmqjMGatM=; b=omch2HYf12Mqf9PiBTZVQnSP7hZcd2SgOUCIACUaLtioElTAnAbcaIdRzV2XDn8HlT XNqugqdS65cvZEjDyW3P9f/enfdYeMQuqL86APDHQAeO0xFrSY1m/HXTpeFcTHUTPNEB +eyTXpmcvDlum3deF2SOFWq29PnbLQodWwZoff8uzhvSjsVr7KppZVtDF1hZL+CRdyVM i+q7g1gwYDAaNIzgGwzxef7iSaDNVqsE9Atc3Pof9jwb9vH3nTBGRh2QMJ7i2C3wnq3J Zl7ej9xEG3ry2/eUYRZ4r33YRTScV2vLLhFMfz1oXEVVOo2ZYxdNKWvTyecsUU6T8K8m MhZw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.200.194 with SMTP id ju2mr39340323wjc.61.1429633173607; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 09:19:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.28.131.16 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 09:19:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <87sibz53kz.fsf@toke.dk> <55313402.5030503@hp.com> <87twwdlias.fsf@toke.dk> <87vbgqizwc.fsf@toke.dk> <87383trh7w.fsf@toke.dk> <87pp6xpq1t.fsf@toke.dk> Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 21:49:33 +0530 Message-ID: From: sahil grover To: =?UTF-8?B?VG9rZSBIw7hpbGFuZC1Kw7hyZ2Vuc2Vu?= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b62499c78da8c05143e6919 Cc: "codel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Codel] RRUL Test X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 16:20:04 -0000 --047d7b62499c78da8c05143e6919 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Toke Sir, Thank you so much. without your help it would never ever have been possible . and i would have to spent many more days in installation itself only. So thanks for everything. Actually there is one more request. kindly tell me something( more than something if possible) about its results(result2.png,result3.png). (1) what is it showing in general? (2) what can i interpret about these graphs related with bufferbloat. i mean where is bufferbloat? (3) Last is , in your articles,you have shown results with fq_codel and codel using netperf-wrapper. How you did that? How can i experiment with them(codel,fq_codel)? what are the requirements? On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 9:05 PM, sahil grover wrote: > yeah with wired network it works: > > 1) netperf-wrapper rrul netperf.bufferbloat.net > > Test data is in ./rrul-2015-04-21T204050.322476.json.gz (use with -i to > format) > > and output is result2.png(is attached). > > 2) netperf-wrapper rrul -p all_scaled -l 60 -H netperf.bufferbloat.net > > Graph(result3.png) is made. > But it does not tell anything at terminal(Like in 1st case Test data is > in....... or command never stops) > Seems like it keeps running. > Is it normal? > > > Also wanna know about what could be issue with my wifi? > > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 8:21 PM, sahil grover > wrote: > >> No,Firewall is disabled. >> >> tried with wired network >> >> 1. netperf -D -0.20 -H netperf.bufferbloat.net -t TCP_STREAM >> >> MIGRATED TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 () port 0 AF_INET to >> atl.richb-hanover.com () port 0 AF_INET : demo >> Interim result: 0.40 10^6bits/s over 0.324 seconds ending at >> 1429627638.283 >> Interim result: 0.28 10^6bits/s over 0.462 seconds ending at >> 1429627638.745 >> Interim result: 1.61 10^6bits/s over 0.244 seconds ending at >> 1429627638.989 >> Interim result: 0.98 10^6bits/s over 0.401 seconds ending at >> 1429627639.390 >> Interim result: 0.51 10^6bits/s over 1.034 seconds ending at >> 1429627640.424 >> Interim result: 0.44 10^6bits/s over 1.491 seconds ending at >> 1429627641.914 >> Interim result: 0.27 10^6bits/s over 2.418 seconds ending at >> 1429627644.333 >> Interim result: 0.70 10^6bits/s over 1.308 seconds ending at >> 1429627645.641 >> Interim result: 0.49 10^6bits/s over 1.334 seconds ending at >> 1429627646.975 >> Interim result: 0.40 10^6bits/s over 0.984 seconds ending at >> 1429627647.959 >> Recv Send Send >> Socket Socket Message Elapsed >> Size Size Size Time Throughput >> bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec >> >> 174760 16384 16384 13.07 0.38 >> >> >> >> >> 2. netperf -D -0.20 -H netperf-eu.bufferbloat.net -t TCP_STREAM >> >> >> MIGRATED TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 () port 0 AF_INET to kau.toke.dk >> () port 0 AF_INET : demo >> Interim result: 0.53 10^6bits/s over 0.247 seconds ending at >> 1429627754.173 >> Interim result: 0.30 10^6bits/s over 0.437 seconds ending at >> 1429627754.610 >> Interim result: 1.70 10^6bits/s over 0.462 seconds ending at >> 1429627755.072 >> Interim result: 1.24 10^6bits/s over 0.424 seconds ending at >> 1429627755.496 >> Interim result: 0.48 10^6bits/s over 1.378 seconds ending at >> 1429627756.874 >> Interim result: 0.39 10^6bits/s over 2.686 seconds ending at >> 1429627759.560 >> Interim result: 0.47 10^6bits/s over 2.215 seconds ending at >> 1429627761.775 >> Interim result: 0.43 10^6bits/s over 2.151 seconds ending at >> 1429627763.926 >> Recv Send Send >> Socket Socket Message Elapsed >> Size Size Size Time Throughput >> bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec >> >> 87380 16384 16384 12.81 0.42 >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen >> wrote: >> >>> sahil grover writes: >>> >>> > netperf -D -0.20 -H netperf-eu.bufferbloat.net -t TCP_STREAM >>> > >>> > Shows: >>> > >>> > MIGRATED TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 () port 0 AF_INET to kau.toke.d= k >>> () port 0 >>> > AF_INET : demo >>> > Recv Send Send >>> > Socket Socket Message Elapsed >>> > Size Size Size Time Throughput >>> > bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec >>> > >>> > 87380 16384 16384 14.00 0.00 >>> >>> Right, so there's definitely something messing with the outgoing >>> traffic. I have no idea what could cause netperf to only be able to sen= d >>> traffic in one direction (perhaps Rick knows?). Do you have any sort of >>> firewall between you and the internet that might interfere with traffic= ? >>> >>> -Toke >>> >> >> > --047d7b62499c78da8c05143e6919 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Toke Sir,
=C2=A0Thank you so much.
without y= our help it would never ever have been possible .
and i would hav= e to spent many more days in installation itself only.
So thanks = for everything.

Actually there is one more request= .

kindly tell me something( more than something if= possible) about its results(result2.png,result3.png).

=
(1) what is it =C2=A0showing in general?

(2) = what can i interpret about these graphs related with bufferbloat.

i mean where is bufferbloat?

(3) L= ast is , in your articles,you have shown results with fq_codel and codel us= ing netperf-wrapper.
How you did that?
How can i =C2=A0= experiment with them(codel,fq_codel)?
what are the requirements?<= /div>





<= /div>


On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 9:05 PM, sahil grover &l= t;sahilgrover= 013@gmail.com> wrote:
yeah =C2=A0with wired network it works:

1) = =C2=A0netperf-wrapper rrul netperf.bufferbloat.net

Test = data is in ./rrul-2015-04-21T204050.322476.json.gz (use with -i to format)<= br>

and output is result2.png(is attached).
<= div>
2) =C2=A0netperf-wrapper rrul -p all_scaled -l 60 -H netperf.bufferblo= at.net

Graph(result3.png) is made.
B= ut it does not tell anything at terminal(Like in 1st case Test data is in..= ..... or command never stops)
Seems like it keeps running.
<= div>Is it normal?


Also wanna know a= bout what could be issue with my wifi?


<= /div>
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 8:21 PM, sahil grover <= span dir=3D"ltr"><sahilgrover013@gmail.com> wrote:
No,Firewall is disabled.

= tried with wired network

1. netperf -D -0.20 -H=C2=A0netperf.buffe= rbloat.net=C2=A0-t TCP_STR= EAM =C2=A0=C2=A0

MIGRATED TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 () port 0 AF_INET to atl.richb-hanover.com () po= rt 0 AF_INET : demo
Interim result: =C2=A0 =C2=A00.40 10^6bits/s over 0.324 seconds endi= ng at 1429627638.283
Interim result: =C2=A0 =C2=A00.28 10^6bits/s over 0.462 seconds end= ing at 1429627638.745
Interim result: =C2=A0 =C2=A01.61 10^6bits/s over 0.244 seconds en= ding at 1429627638.989
Interim result: =C2=A0 =C2=A00.98 10^6bits/s over 0.401 seconds e= nding at 1429627639.390
Interim result: =C2=A0 =C2=A00.51 10^6bits/s over 1.034 seconds = ending at 1429627640.424
Interim result: =C2=A0 =C2=A00.44 10^6bits/s over 1.491 seconds= ending at 1429627641.914
Interim result: =C2=A0 =C2=A00.27 10^6bits/s over 2.418 second= s ending at 1429627644.333
Interim result: =C2=A0 =C2=A00.70 10^6bits/s over 1.308 secon= ds ending at 1429627645.641
Interim result: =C2=A0 =C2=A00.49 10^6bits/s over 1.334 seco= nds ending at 1429627646.975
Interim result: =C2=A0 =C2=A00.40 10^6bits/s over 0.984 sec= onds ending at 1429627647.959
Recv =C2=A0 Send =C2=A0 =C2=A0Send =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0
Socket Socket = =C2=A0Message =C2=A0Elapsed =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0
Size =C2= =A0 Size =C2=A0 =C2=A0Size =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Time =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Throughput =C2= =A0
bytes =C2= =A0bytes =C2=A0 bytes =C2=A0 =C2=A0secs. =C2=A0 =C2=A010^6bits/sec =C2=A0

174760 =C2=A016= 384 =C2=A016384 =C2=A0 =C2=A013.07 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0.38=C2=A0




2. =C2=A0netperf -D -0.20 -H=C2=A0netperf-eu.bufferbloat.net=C2=A0-t TCP_STREAM

=

MIGRATED TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 () port 0 AF_INE= T to kau.toke.dk () po= rt 0 AF_INET : demo
= Interim result: =C2=A0 =C2=A00= .53 10^6bits/s over 0.247 seconds ending at 1429627754.173
Interim result: =C2=A0 =C2=A00.30 10^6bits/s over 0.437 seconds ending at= 1429627754.610
Interim result: =C2=A0 =C2=A01.70 10^6bit= s/s over 0.462 seconds ending at 1429627755.072
Interim r= esult: =C2=A0 =C2=A01.24 10^6bits/s over 0.424 seconds ending at 1429627755= .496
Interim result: =C2=A0 =C2=A00.48 10^6bits/s over 1.= 378 seconds ending at 1429627756.874
Interim result: =C2= =A0 =C2=A00.39 10^6bits/s over 2.686 seconds ending at 1429627759.560
Interim result: =C2=A0 =C2=A00.47 10^6bits/s over 2.215 second= s ending at 1429627761.775
= Interim result: =C2=A0 =C2=A00= .43 10^6bits/s over 2.151 seconds ending at 1429627763.926
Recv =C2=A0 Send =C2=A0 =C2=A0Send =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0
Socket Socket =C2=A0Message =C2=A0Elapsed =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0
Size =C2=A0 Size =C2=A0 =C2=A0Size = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Time =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Throughput =C2=A0
= bytes = =C2=A0bytes =C2=A0 bytes =C2=A0 =C2=A0secs. =C2=A0 =C2=A010^6bits/sec =C2= =A0

=C2=A087380 =C2=A016384= =C2=A016384 =C2=A0 =C2=A012.81 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 0.42 =C2=A0=C2=A0





On Tue, Ap= r 21, 2015 at 7:00 PM, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen &= lt;toke@toke.dk> wrote:
sahil grover <sahilgrover013@gma= il.com> writes:

> netperf -D -0.20 -H netperf-eu.bufferbloat.net -t TCP_STREAM
>
> Shows:
>
> MIGRATED TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 () port 0 AF_INET to kau.toke.dk () port 0
> AF_INET : demo
> Recv Send Send
> Socket Socket Message Elapsed
> Size Size Size Time Throughput
> bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
>
> 87380 16384 16384 14.00 0.00

Right, so there's definitely something messing with the outgoing=
traffic. I have no idea what could cause netperf to only be able to send traffic in one direction (perhaps Rick knows?). Do you have any sort of
firewall between you and the internet that might interfere with traffic?
-Toke



--047d7b62499c78da8c05143e6919--