From: sahil grover <sahilgrover013@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Cc: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Codel] why RED is not considered as a solution to bufferbloat.
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 21:50:19 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADnS-2hSsThT5gSXuFb=MM8DDTrya5ZzYYYWgsXv2Omj_RbxAg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJq5cE30Rv0U0xhD7ZTfDHkgs8z99F3KoOEKxh3Z9o2ERDY-Wg@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 521 bytes --]
So we can say Codel is better than other AQM???
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Simply put, RED is a very old algorithm, one of the first viable AQM
> algorithms. However, it proved to be so difficult to configure properly
> that almost nobody uses it, even though many carrier grade routers
> implement it.
>
> Codel not only performs better than an ideally configured RED, but is far
> easier to configure. This makes it much more deployable.
>
> - Jonathan Morton
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 915 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-24 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-24 15:37 sahil grover
2015-02-24 15:54 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-02-24 16:20 ` sahil grover [this message]
2015-02-24 16:32 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-02-24 18:00 ` Dave Taht
2015-02-24 18:15 ` Dave Taht
[not found] ` <CADnS-2jBfvSzgWmio3y_hyozPYnPzgUX+bLAh0j8VB90HspBNg@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAA93jw70w1__gkE5ooqK3eJ12mJGWUnMKMg7MR=uN6+DEr9iPg@mail.gmail.com>
2015-02-26 12:58 ` sahil grover
2015-02-26 13:56 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-02-27 14:34 ` sahil grover
2015-02-27 15:25 ` Richard Scheffenegger
2015-03-04 6:51 ` Greg White
2015-03-04 7:15 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-02-24 22:40 ` Kathleen Nichols
2015-02-24 16:33 ` Richard Scheffenegger
2015-02-24 17:29 ` sahil grover
2015-02-24 17:35 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-02-24 16:27 ` Wesley Eddy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/codel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CADnS-2hSsThT5gSXuFb=MM8DDTrya5ZzYYYWgsXv2Omj_RbxAg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=sahilgrover013@gmail.com \
--cc=chromatix99@gmail.com \
--cc=codel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox