From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-la0-x229.google.com (mail-la0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AF4E21F293 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 08:20:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by labhs14 with SMTP id hs14so26809486lab.1 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 08:20:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=sbyrqc1So+jU9NfPykIMJuMeCuEUBiWGNd/bSlxxZ48=; b=JVqozR9XY3XHhKOszmWUE+zbZD4yCyLu+HYr95gXGoy74KKaY7a3K2mErrzsf7z4Ue MBcloSs8QVsNrhcFjIZyAgf4mAhv3a/F5R5e26MJvjubdMGybiOd1MaB8sM5RtEeUro1 eZf+Qv+0kFs3ykCwDEh2QAaLe15udfxPS+dUYCkxwk69jidmbxhp/UOJH1SqGMsfI70K L9Op76+ZhAUvYbGxfyeBIaqycqbGZ95kuYnTbbo+nn+vlYMoet2DeyLwqy6n4V2DZWCR C0V4pDqHimMZ9lPCKOdILfSYrAUjpKhHxKtImZUCzVgnED3fb0YhzA+6hS3shDPk1pxK 8R1g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.235.38 with SMTP id uj6mr348329lbc.9.1424794819928; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 08:20:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.25.147.75 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 08:20:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 21:50:19 +0530 Message-ID: From: sahil grover To: Jonathan Morton Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3cf281ea9be050fd7e554 Cc: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Codel] why RED is not considered as a solution to bufferbloat. X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 16:20:50 -0000 --001a11c3cf281ea9be050fd7e554 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 So we can say Codel is better than other AQM??? On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Jonathan Morton wrote: > Simply put, RED is a very old algorithm, one of the first viable AQM > algorithms. However, it proved to be so difficult to configure properly > that almost nobody uses it, even though many carrier grade routers > implement it. > > Codel not only performs better than an ideally configured RED, but is far > easier to configure. This makes it much more deployable. > > - Jonathan Morton > --001a11c3cf281ea9be050fd7e554 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
So we can say Codel is better than other AQM???

On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 a= t 9:24 PM, Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> wrote= :

Simply put, RED is a ver= y old algorithm, one of the first viable AQM algorithms. However, it proved= to be so difficult to configure properly that almost nobody uses it, even = though many carrier grade routers implement it.

Codel not only performs better than an ideally configured RE= D, but is far easier to configure. This makes it much more deployable.

<= span class=3D"HOEnZb">

- Jonathan Morton


--001a11c3cf281ea9be050fd7e554--