From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-la0-x233.google.com (mail-la0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44F4821F2B4 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 07:37:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by labge10 with SMTP id ge10so26374388lab.12 for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 07:37:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=C2IUwd2F3KA8ZzL9SAiNm7isWdz2yVX6kKxP51B93LM=; b=TPdNTAN9aF53BTinbvLBHrNNKHFt9wQ5+wZANt/ild3g8CezPFkDr1BmVQMOfCjRgo GIX6cllyW0avyMdeGnXz8E0/wL/2yP74HX/U6c8h+GGatxlgmR3usOfvXSEBKoGLDQ3k kCRHKsF4foGygIei1wIJg68qpdTqpLxqe+xciNSLzjqwvwaJutsals9YazS/sGRZNGou 7NHYnJRkmZA+EvhEcnWSz0RbqqOtG026qdb+jaeG6vCyCvv6oQ16mMOrwLWMq/gbJfZV fnWeilzLeaqst1SWYBXxzaQ828IQeiIzMTEyDzoW31+VUfq1QC8WsC4TK9DjAq+4O3qH dbEQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.153.7.100 with SMTP id db4mr3479719lad.9.1424792248111; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 07:37:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.25.147.75 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Feb 2015 07:37:28 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 21:07:28 +0530 Message-ID: From: sahil grover To: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134730ed3d60d050fd74bc6 Subject: [Codel] why RED is not considered as a solution to bufferbloat. X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 15:38:01 -0000 --001a1134730ed3d60d050fd74bc6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 (i) First of all,i want to know whether RED was implemented or not? if not then what were the reasons(major) ? anyone please tell me in simple words here only,because i don't want to read any paper like "RED in a different light". (ii)Second, as we all know RED controls the average queue size from growing. So it also controls delay in a way or we can say is a solution to bufferbloat problem. Then why it was not considered. --001a1134730ed3d60d050fd74bc6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
(i) First of all,i want to know whether RED was implemente= d or not?=C2=A0
if not then what were the reasons(major) ?
an= yone please tell me in simple words here only,because i don't want to r= ead any paper like "RED in a different light".

(ii)Second, as we all know RED controls the =C2=A0average queue size from = growing.
So it also controls delay in a way or =C2=A0we = can say =C2=A0is a solution to bufferbloat problem. Then why it was not con= sidered.


--001a1134730ed3d60d050fd74bc6--