From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io1-xd30.google.com (mail-io1-xd30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19D0C3CB35 for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2018 05:14:28 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-io1-xd30.google.com with SMTP id s22so14179003ioc.8 for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2018 02:14:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=KqT2DmgB8UwnVg2hgdSXmlZkkF975qxYtIV5niBF6rU=; b=HAsVjv1HkTitfnKqAdtYQLAQ6l3IK2ouvYhnFQZhusIKUYJSosK5nV4VO1e+DK2Gip 08rkgGqoiUh0dje40IXiygy/zLWZ4Eti/PWFxYSFfdUq7Ol2g9hz5fhQ//S8/K4A75uK OS7n25aRolsTg16RMjhLu/GOLnpG17Z5G8oaRcRQSu3WVoT/ENTimxvZdx3PAr3Q7H9r fumBHZ3Y06Our6YYi5pIrhmPYW/Uw5lQcDtUMxLHgnLip6VN4QexF7DjgL4hZ52EFr7q l6U+Zn8MJz8tSxNBUDBU1Ti8yUTZDICU4YSIY25X9u4IKT7a61zbWkBlwqE1XY5VhCaD VN9w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=KqT2DmgB8UwnVg2hgdSXmlZkkF975qxYtIV5niBF6rU=; b=Sy5+vWt9cCeGwqfTsf2T4/pTl2E4NtlKgTjPVGMQ/VguzYJ6bnwPBHKw8dSeD7hTv8 wmLVBVdNSmLJfdTggDfimIcqVdVJj6RT1sbsik/LEU012PLJpVtm/f0ORKcjBbVm9IxD Rlh8ZY3QoXqPttAvIxjjf+b2z7seqpjSmIG8qbUmj++qrymPIJ9g6wbyC8mU2NWAlnAh 9/a0OogCZPe85w2UerUWqD3fqJRUf4QuKZbRAwX+/maL5Ms6/fU0G4PV0pSItl/73fVO NaShoUS10L5ldZfJzd0/tRrpCzcuUPETVr21gn/GA12s8pMIWqPz4kY/MBWrwh2C5r5c TizQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukcv/qyGiDL6U+2a1t5Z2o1+tzux3YUohHX400IBKPcfxD1Y7cpN CDXIwOru3eam+Qh6lzKqLhUEc7IJ0jt3DtjzVP2JbaJjD6Y9iQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN4uLaqBHnAci9icz5kwK72Hk0Dzdn5mBZ409kbYX9mgQPAMT1H+WyYIilvIIJTXaIPmsjBtNge1Y61Bx/9/JLc= X-Received: by 2002:a5e:8817:: with SMTP id l23mr14569822ioj.272.1545905667479; Thu, 27 Dec 2018 02:14:27 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Rodrigo Alvarez Dominguez Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2018 11:14:07 +0100 Message-ID: To: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002a9e9e057dfe36d4" Subject: [Codel] Codel+netem X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2018 10:14:28 -0000 --0000000000002a9e9e057dfe36d4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi I would like to test an environment where there is a ftp client + router + ftp server. The router will have a fqcodel in the interface client-router link will have a netem delay + rate router-server link will have a netem delay + rate The router interface of the client-router link will have the fq codel implementation of linux I am not sure if it should work after reading this https://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/codel/wiki/Best_practices_for_benchmarking_Codel_and_FQ_Codel/ It seems that FQ_Codel + netem is incompatible. Am I right? Thanks in advance, Regards, Rodrigo --0000000000002a9e9e057dfe36d4 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi
I would like to test an environmen= t where there is a ftp client=C2=A0+ router=C2=A0+ ftp server.
Th= e router will have a fqcodel in the interface
client-router link = will have a netem delay=C2=A0+ rate
router-server link will have = a netem delay=C2=A0+ rate

The router interface of = the client-router link will have the fq codel implementation of linux
=

I am not sure if it should work after reading this

It seems that FQ_Codel=C2=A0+ netem is incompatib= le. Am I right?
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
R= odrigo
--0000000000002a9e9e057dfe36d4--