From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: cake@lists.bufferbloat.net,
"codel@lists.bufferbloat.net" <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Codel] [Cake] Today's cake
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 09:25:18 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJq5cE1FVLjpbQWOdcU2izspNdGiE=UFQZy1zSZON+MgCnkL8Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw4LrZ+oPExKtoxj6ufqZiFxT09J=tPv49_DFe_5shU6Gg@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 811 bytes --]
>> The “50 up 1 down asymmetric” test now produces the desired results for
the download stream *without* the need to prioritise the acks; Codel now
reaches a steady-ish state where it drops enough of them to keep everything
moving, and this leaves more bandwidth in the up direction for the 50
streams.
>>
>> The version of that test with a prioritised download stream reveals that
quite a lot of drops (as well as marks) are still occurring in the 50
streams. This, to my mind, is a sign of too much aggression in the switch
from marking to dropping, but I need to work out the numbers to be more
confident about adjusting that.
>
>k. What bandwidth?
100/10 Mbit, no added latency, on a LAN.
I should also check what happens when I add a little latency to the mix.
- Jonathan Morton
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 913 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-17 6:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-17 5:49 [Codel] " Jonathan Morton
2015-06-17 6:16 ` [Codel] [Cake] " Dave Taht
2015-06-17 6:25 ` Jonathan Morton [this message]
2015-06-18 14:31 ` [Codel] [Bloat] " Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/codel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJq5cE1FVLjpbQWOdcU2izspNdGiE=UFQZy1zSZON+MgCnkL8Q@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=chromatix99@gmail.com \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=codel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox