From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-bk0-f47.google.com (mail-bk0-f47.google.com [209.85.214.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C966F21F144 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 10:07:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-bk0-f47.google.com with SMTP id j4so1901530bkw.6 for ; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 10:07:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=g/NtsNVRkIviDvmiFg+37RiGDkLZfYhUR5xqhtqFhas=; b=QWeLH0SeP6ZO8KixT1nMFUxECtZg6XQhTfANSNTOwqIroL3PqDGT1JgKqZRqov11PR LR85zfzf/NH11x1cZqwItDZE8zS0VtK5ZRZ+3IUv1GERbQILZKUJnVpoB2A89EFwTEzR xRl+M/6JyeVAI908gtqAG+8D0vYGIWFkl7USG3w2PbKgzwjWWvmsbBGhoKwTUtLrexEr waIHy281aHp2jQCop67k/zPD2pUiqnlSSjGc3iA7Sm4zC9p4MGOZAxt1K5UQD7Tsznz3 RF7tzxrLM5EccuZrfWRFZC0n9VaR4I7r4dHpbdwmApbcv/xG98iPy8eTOygI3tB4ImdU S32Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.120.3 with SMTP id fw3mr5095341bkc.40.1356026875640; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 10:07:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.36.138 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 10:07:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.36.138 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 10:07:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 20:07:55 +0200 Message-ID: From: Jonathan Morton To: Alessandro Bolletta Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001517475cb03a7a5704d14c9caf Cc: "Codel@lists.bufferbloat.net" Subject: Re: [Codel] Making tests on Tp-link router powered by Openwrt svn X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 18:07:58 -0000 --001517475cb03a7a5704d14c9caf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Is the bottleneck actually at your router, or (as is more usual) at the modem? - Jonathan Morton On Dec 20, 2012 7:57 PM, "Alessandro Bolletta" wrote: > Hi everybody, > Today i made some tests on my tplink home router powered by the lastest > snapshot build of Openwrt. > So, i configured tc to make fq_codel the default queuing algorithm for 2 > eth ports available on the router (leaving unchanged default values). > So, i started some TCP sessions through my Windows client and I loaded the > available bandwidth...but the test wasn't going as expected because i > experienced packet loss and high delays as i did when the default simple > fifo queue was the default queue. > Is there something that i'm not understanding? > > Thanks, > Alessandro Bolletta > _______________________________________________ > Codel mailing list > Codel@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel > --001517475cb03a7a5704d14c9caf Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Is the bottleneck actually at your router, or (as is more usual) at the = modem?

- Jonathan Morton

On Dec 20, 2012 7:57 PM, "Alessandro Bollet= ta" <alessandro@mediasp= ot.net> wrote:
Codel@lists.bufferbloat.net<= /a>
= https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel
--001517475cb03a7a5704d14c9caf--