From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Codel] hardware multiqueue in fq_codel?
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 22:41:20 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJq5cE2HUgHMzAornsrF+3FaF18PFrk0UNqwexYY15itCSorxw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw6rd1G2Q4pmfAB5GPuwfqCbVPDw6njCaceszD9q5Avz_A@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 628 bytes --]
> 4) ECN processing is enabled by default (but off by default in sysctl)
I don't see any harm in handling ECN correctly in the qdisc at all times.
It is routers that screw it up that require ECN negotiation to be disabled
at the endpoints by default - I assume that's the sysctl you're referring
to.
The more ECN traffic there is in the wild, the more visible the problems
will be with the broken routers, and the greater the likelihood that they
might actually get fixed. And the greater benefit perceived to be attached
to ECN by end users and net admins, the more likely they are to actually
turn it on.
- Jonathan Morton
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 725 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-11 19:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-11 17:09 Dave Taht
2013-07-11 17:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-11 18:06 ` Dave Taht
2013-07-11 18:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-11 21:18 ` Dave Taht
2013-07-12 0:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-12 0:48 ` Dave Taht
2013-07-12 9:34 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-07-12 15:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-12 16:36 ` Sebastian Moeller
2013-07-12 16:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-12 17:00 ` Dave Taht
2013-07-15 13:40 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-07-15 13:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-15 14:24 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-07-15 15:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-15 17:19 ` Dave Taht
2013-07-12 16:37 ` Dave Taht
2013-07-12 16:39 ` Dave Taht
2013-07-12 16:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-12 16:54 ` Dave Taht
2013-07-12 17:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-12 17:35 ` Dave Taht
2013-07-12 17:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-07-12 18:06 ` Dave Taht
2013-07-15 12:56 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2013-07-12 17:32 ` luca.muscariello
2013-07-11 19:41 ` Jonathan Morton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/codel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJq5cE2HUgHMzAornsrF+3FaF18PFrk0UNqwexYY15itCSorxw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=chromatix99@gmail.com \
--cc=codel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox