From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
To: sahil grover <sahilgrover013@gmail.com>
Cc: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Codel] why RED is not considered as a solution to bufferbloat.
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 18:32:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJq5cE3dqpLW76HtJgreB-qmQ+1Fe4wAqwM0jYHU022ESn8r_A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADnS-2hSsThT5gSXuFb=MM8DDTrya5ZzYYYWgsXv2Omj_RbxAg@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 659 bytes --]
Most of us on this list believe that to be true, in many cases after
performing experiments ourselves, or at least looking through data
generated by others' experiments.
However, if as I suspect you are investigating various AQM algorithms as
part of your education, you should probably examine the data yourselves and
come to your own conclusions. You may even get extra credit for being able
to describe the difference between AQM and Fair Queuing, and how they can
be combined (as in fq_codel) to give the benefits of both types in one go.
But for that, you ARE going to need to read some boring papers like "RED in
a different light".
- Jonathan Morton
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 732 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-24 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-24 15:37 sahil grover
2015-02-24 15:54 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-02-24 16:20 ` sahil grover
2015-02-24 16:32 ` Jonathan Morton [this message]
2015-02-24 18:00 ` Dave Taht
2015-02-24 18:15 ` Dave Taht
[not found] ` <CADnS-2jBfvSzgWmio3y_hyozPYnPzgUX+bLAh0j8VB90HspBNg@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <CAA93jw70w1__gkE5ooqK3eJ12mJGWUnMKMg7MR=uN6+DEr9iPg@mail.gmail.com>
2015-02-26 12:58 ` sahil grover
2015-02-26 13:56 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-02-27 14:34 ` sahil grover
2015-02-27 15:25 ` Richard Scheffenegger
2015-03-04 6:51 ` Greg White
2015-03-04 7:15 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-02-24 22:40 ` Kathleen Nichols
2015-02-24 16:33 ` Richard Scheffenegger
2015-02-24 17:29 ` sahil grover
2015-02-24 17:35 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-02-24 16:27 ` Wesley Eddy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/codel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJq5cE3dqpLW76HtJgreB-qmQ+1Fe4wAqwM0jYHU022ESn8r_A@mail.gmail.com \
--to=chromatix99@gmail.com \
--cc=codel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=sahilgrover013@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox