From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ycheng@google.com>
Received: from mail-oa0-f43.google.com (mail-oa0-f43.google.com
	[209.85.219.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4DBE202187
	for <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 18:47:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id k1so8921800oag.16
	for <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 18:47:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type
	:x-system-of-record;
	bh=FA9Ae6uIACbSTeZ4nmt8rzjbfIC/TupirN6jk1P7qho=;
	b=PM/P2eH29JWtn0FrHbVVamveorJ122J4vbFvkaeBxoLy+sfJWlczp+nRFTb9FlFi6P
	cEO9cTbYBvPMya4KQAjz1eyxnozWltUainlVlZa2BK4yAq4O3maBq8EWB8tSlB56tcyE
	5nAWsGoA+wpUDtuA03lqv1N0N768fLk8G5AxGcQ/00ff+pQioY3y8QNjjJkSxz7wER7P
	wBurV5t3jXaUSmU33Xc2PI6bZlNviEOzw+xDX5K5LqiO4VID4FpPdiI4rnvjSfcwLqfx
	FR8jVvHdtxFxYjaw0tluJUX3K/pbPUxRfDO3Hb1QitnUws3iAawYkxwU+a3sHpYKwyPw
	K8Dw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=google.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type
	:x-system-of-record:x-gm-message-state;
	bh=FA9Ae6uIACbSTeZ4nmt8rzjbfIC/TupirN6jk1P7qho=;
	b=IAv1YYahfxZK+CVf6VVI7iMHK/7UcauIqf9K9Selk1KPRM7IH13a4B3qA0Tm3mB2w9
	/hJdsXA2o1J7JjamDr/ikr5vKQs17N/Sz+x76BGWrUHAEGVlQtXyxdKq0aOVW8Y7BslE
	v8q44vr4wR++THNqs04cjSyejd5XaxH4JaTkw7bB9kDbZjXCZYaaukSiIZ9x7vTlHy9M
	G7mn2Un0BtiKpXk3LeH9MirffaIWl99mERHR5Ezruhk5e+PeJh97wg3DcWSxuj5PvWnN
	3Cq9V/Py3bZtP6z76eBVaiqihjD7qLjQ4rlgxUIYqOUg4rJJWLoulvXIJdZDXIY402oU
	I0hw==
Received: by 10.60.169.198 with SMTP id ag6mr8709919oec.35.1350438469516; Tue,
	16 Oct 2012 18:47:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.1.166 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 18:47:29 -0700 (PDT)
From: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 18:47:29 -0700
Message-ID: <CAK6E8=ewMSoNfN=dzx8FCN-CmCx0vQ=oUODrORSpv_dcTeam0Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-System-Of-Record: true
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn/IU9Z8zKRmT3J9c2a9VNl2gaXHzAtOhMYZYrTZTeHIoUjwRmgGYK1LEC0MP0OTBc/WuZLsMqo4SgtqZUPgKJ2oKqhItxmjOGRIszbDd7y+yEMo5EXy6e8jX+PDhiFO7csNof2a5JUZfbNXUp7Zwun05T1NRKkgZlaCdzyfd2zsOTSteDho/Ao/XWj6ftZbAagZ0Uy9meQnMWwywZNIs4cWu2CuA==
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>, Bob Briscoe <bob.briscoe@bt.com>
Subject: [Codel] Web benchmark of {fq_}codel
X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions <codel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/codel>
List-Post: <mailto:codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 01:47:52 -0000

Hi,

Recently Andrew observed good latency impact on deploying fq_codel in
residential and office networks
(http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tsvwg/current/msg11485.html). Do
people have more detailed benchmarks, in particular on Web and/or RTC
latency?

Yuchung