From: "Roger Jørgensen" <rogerj@gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Codel] [PATCH net-next] codel: use Newton method instead of sqrt() and divides
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 20:31:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKFn1SG19AyQfSR79Pm=RuLPnr2osF55ETFAisA=_-kgPYd12g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw7Kk=hLXnGinDPsS3UqBn6J+OqMcsyv08ZNmroYdBBnrg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 4:34 AM, Roger Jørgensen <rogerj@gmail.com> wrote:
<snip>
>> rtt min avg max mdev bw test showing
>> plain 1,037 2,327 5,123 0,558 2,4Gbps
>> TBF 1,529 2,87 8,275 0,547 1,5Gbps
>> fq_codel +ecn 0,907 1,82 5,214 0,547 1,4Gbps
>> fq_codel noec 0,905 1,913 4,95 0,586 1,4Gbps
>
>
> I find your results mildly puzzling. certainly your max rtt in the no
> ecn case is pleasing,
> but your max throughput in all three AQM cases seems to be rather
> severely capped.
I did try to capp the bandwidth, (that's why the values for fq_codel
is as they are), the idea was to limit the bw and see how the pingtime
vary with that. Turns out that bw capping give better pingtime than no
capping :-)
and since I can see how it work I'll try to run it on a linux box
acting as gateway for a wireless guestnetwork to see it under real
load :-)
<snip>
--
Roger Jorgensen | ROJO9-RIPE
rogerj@gmail.com | - IPv6 is The Key!
http://www.jorgensen.no | roger@jorgensen.no
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-14 18:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-12 13:32 Eric Dumazet
2012-05-12 19:52 ` David Miller
2012-05-12 20:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-12 20:45 ` David Miller
2012-05-12 21:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-12 21:52 ` David Miller
2012-05-13 7:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-14 5:46 ` Andrew McGregor
2012-05-14 6:00 ` dave taht
2012-05-14 6:17 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-14 6:33 ` dave taht
2012-05-14 6:47 ` dave taht
2012-05-14 6:51 ` Roger Jørgensen
2012-05-14 8:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-14 8:50 ` dave taht
2012-05-14 9:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-14 11:34 ` Roger Jørgensen
2012-05-14 11:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-05-14 15:05 ` Dave Taht
2012-05-14 18:31 ` Roger Jørgensen [this message]
2012-05-14 22:33 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/codel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAKFn1SG19AyQfSR79Pm=RuLPnr2osF55ETFAisA=_-kgPYd12g@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=rogerj@gmail.com \
--cc=codel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox