From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-f171.google.com (mail-ob0-f171.google.com [209.85.214.171]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2768821F0DB for ; Sat, 4 Aug 2012 00:00:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obqv19 with SMTP id v19so5204606obq.16 for ; Sat, 04 Aug 2012 00:00:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Y93qDw/5mfbEtFRkNurj7dSVIzKgXqQr2HAG4/IXI4o=; b=PpnZqCPTlt7i+95lh369nolm6y6E0/GAiv+J+ic3m+iSScG0kNH95Gdf6TSfTA0d+u JoUABdPEJe/7gUa3AxSDI43y9fPY7AQ3Dks9K3qeZ9I00puhoBGsKjA+gsfIuL2cPOqg Ez33XE/bQKLSt9tqwT9GY0F5Q5co5pVWoo5bRwN56+tB+gh7S8eFvUq4Cu7Qzain51GF SKQAxkhzvafqgV9oZU2K3QFdNLSLTJI9y7837mpcc8nfDpijVqv8ifsRHcATG3DLusDo AQ2Z6h2WgI5ffOGdlOsHl1IjS3Z0jGCXGSMJjBFXIiVF19MLApr9tULJKNZIlk/qebAf biZQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.173.39 with SMTP id bh7mr557818igc.44.1344063626244; Sat, 04 Aug 2012 00:00:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.142.169 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Aug 2012 00:00:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1344048299-26267-1-git-send-email-dave.taht@bufferbloat.net> References: <1344048299-26267-1-git-send-email-dave.taht@bufferbloat.net> Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2012 09:00:26 +0200 Message-ID: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_J=F8rgensen?= To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dave_T=E4ht?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Codel] [RFC PATCH] codel: ecn mark at target X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2012 07:00:28 -0000 On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 4:44 AM, Dave T=E4ht wro= te: > From: Dave Taht > > The consensus at ietf was that ecn marking should start at > target, and then the results fed into the codel drop scheduler. > > While I agree with the latter, I feel that waiting an interval > before starting to mark will be more in-tune with the concept > of a sojourn time, and lead to better utilization. > > As I am outnumbered and outgunned, do it at target. Well, what do you think is The Best way of doing it? Prove'em wrong if you really think they are wrong;) --=20 Roger Jorgensen | ROJO9-RIPE rogerj@gmail.com | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | roger@jorgensen.no