From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <sk.anirudh@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-vc0-x22a.google.com (mail-vc0-x22a.google.com
	[IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22a])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A440E21F18F
	for <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Thu,  5 Dec 2013 12:36:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vc0-f170.google.com with SMTP id ht10so13913666vcb.1
	for <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 12:36:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=8vy/nQAYxSk3AMLJedJ/5WDo1z4ZZVbgHWEedmDA6qc=;
	b=OtehsGkUMCxVgm2Nzp2cq63h9MgDJTZNkeGwA1gygXYahmORBwgMpcY7aW4A11p4Zn
	bl5+Px1UEi1xb4FUObICBRrOAyf3pnU9R/zo1nHy/H2Ah033VjOCJvAMR3S+adg4SrDE
	xzyFuRu4/PpGByjK//tSTHmPE+Cpbn2aiFaLEyghZPueH+ZW4dzW2EW0iuKUrQZpaqEY
	tjV5Kd09ZogGQWDFPdhdoe+82ATYW1mXW2cjOy1HWso8M4/tZUpPrGCBP5c1ECiLwL8a
	w8F56Rj4+OavrTEyMeUY0XRmFarI7mir12mtbvinq6WsfmwJRv4J7GOOjlmxnVHwSGug
	wvKw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.221.39.195 with SMTP id tn3mr65460653vcb.2.1386275817428;
	Thu, 05 Dec 2013 12:36:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.255.195 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 12:36:57 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAAUsAoSWBDBAj4K831GEwrVM-ixoufYdEKssdDFmW2-jZ7BPKg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAUsAoSWBDBAj4K831GEwrVM-ixoufYdEKssdDFmW2-jZ7BPKg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 15:36:57 -0500
Message-ID: <CAMdC6xb4iyaL=hBZjspVP3YsZ6d2sxYZ-OrTXFRr3Tg_Fr2NwA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Anirudh Sivaraman <sk.anirudh@gmail.com>
To: Dong Mo <montedong@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Codel] How to make a bufferbloat fairqueue with tc qdisc
X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions <codel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/codel>
List-Post: <mailto:codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 20:36:58 -0000

On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Dong Mo <montedong@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear List,
> I am trying to make a bufferbloat fairqueue with qdisc and compare that with
> fq_codel.
> However, I am now having some hard time doing it.
>
> The commands I am using are:
>
> tc qdisc add dev $IFACE root handle 1: htb default 1
> tc class add dev $IFACE parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 40mbit
> tc qdisc del dev eth4 parent 1:1 handle 10: sfq perturb 10
>
> And sending packet from the sender, where sfq qdisc is set, to the receiver,
> the queuing delay is quite small and is approximately the same as when
> fq_codel enabled.
>
> However, if I am not using sfq (only htb set), and send only one flow over
> this link, the delay will explode again.
>
> So is sfq here cut off the queue length somehow? How should I make a
> bufferbloat fair queue on linux box using tc qdisc?
>

You could start with the fq_codel qdisc and set the codel interval and
target parameters to absurdly large values (say 1000 seconds each) to
simulate a qdisc that has fair queuing but almost never drops a
packet.

Anirudh

> Thanks
>
> -Mo Dong
>
> _______________________________________________
> Codel mailing list
> Codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel
>