From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <divyasingla1989@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-ig0-x236.google.com (mail-ig0-x236.google.com
	[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::236])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D8C421F170
	for <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Mon,  2 Mar 2015 10:43:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by igqa13 with SMTP id a13so19837618igq.0
	for <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 10:43:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=eI6DdNv6uajvnlKpOKI+1yWGp3h9d/gyrDKzDER/hVo=;
	b=GGSiA0CVpoCKI5dxUUzM2OYYbMbywW0bfQh79RyZJyiVN5YluXYVgRG79rKJH+kRX6
	ktoMpmCfC1hbton+BZm+TMuj3rD+teAlvTAq9ojkMwzCfJZdGp8TGIHpND6WrVhcsKp1
	U9xbqdSFIP3sz9JytP5OyfZxPic41unYdIK8qNLDEOmGHQxXpYLHbP19q2INfU92t4gj
	xZuCvVgA4wKY94mKM/5iJAvPW1T0S3gu+3FjsylttADVIpV+WfEHU7EhYm2ZrXPeOfu3
	0zr5JKmErabDTKmzWDfrUBgOjLheyvQ2hw//hFzzfo2FmhFnLWa3cZhRXncGo8bzZvVX
	3q6Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.130.25 with SMTP id e25mr38977111iod.49.1425321780301;
	Mon, 02 Mar 2015 10:43:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.107.156.201 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 10:43:00 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAJq5cE3BaF0fzGUhFk=rhRycOh2gjn3M=BTQsFQ6nT0jUbEE+g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAONkte9+XLPomhAkwoN6hwGz6a0BkbBDDQF__mGpRaTvB8XcRA@mail.gmail.com>
	<5EDCCC18D27F4F039FA971B3C834A466@srichardlxp2>
	<20150226151457.75fc898b@urahara>
	<CAONkte8SoCJysWWotpf-v4OPtUo4bJ_+TodaNFW8=6mnUDHaTg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAJq5cE3BaF0fzGUhFk=rhRycOh2gjn3M=BTQsFQ6nT0jUbEE+g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 00:13:00 +0530
Message-ID: <CAONkte_r4n9F5vJtt8gTh_6Qc4RnJdCDHFMr0aL_eyPtsFbi6A@mail.gmail.com>
From: divya singla <divyasingla1989@gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113fb6d667d3ed051052960a
Cc: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Codel] About Packet Drop in Codel
X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions <codel.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/codel>
List-Post: <mailto:codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel>,
	<mailto:codel-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 18:43:29 -0000

--001a113fb6d667d3ed051052960a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

okay and can you tell about UDP ?
UDP does not respond to packet loss.Then  it would be  advantage for UDP,i
guess.


On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:52 PM, Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
wrote:

> The delay to that individual packet's data may be increased, but the queue
> length is reduced by triggering TCP's congestion control, reducing the
> delay to other packets by (in aggregate) a much larger amount.
>
> And with ECN marking, even the victim packet is not delayed extra.
>
> - Jonathan Morton
>

--001a113fb6d667d3ed051052960a
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">okay and can you tell about UDP ?<div>UDP does not respond=
 to packet loss.Then =C2=A0it would be =C2=A0advantage for UDP,i guess.</di=
v><div><br></div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_q=
uote">On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:52 PM, Jonathan Morton <span dir=3D"ltr">&l=
t;<a href=3D"mailto:chromatix99@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">chromatix99@gm=
ail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D=
"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><p dir=3D"l=
tr">The delay to that individual packet&#39;s data may be increased, but th=
e queue length is reduced by triggering TCP&#39;s congestion control, reduc=
ing the delay to other packets by (in aggregate) a much larger amount.</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">And with ECN marking, even the victim packet is not delayed =
extra.</p><span class=3D"HOEnZb"><font color=3D"#888888">
<p dir=3D"ltr"> - Jonathan Morton<br>
</p>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div>

--001a113fb6d667d3ed051052960a--