From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf1-x12f.google.com (mail-lf1-x12f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF2903BA8E for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 11:48:52 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-lf1-x12f.google.com with SMTP id u18so2540219lff.10 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 08:48:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=LM12AAbQbcN8jk5JgwrivD46g7zPOEx2HbtCVudQgso=; b=KcU86BIp5hn39REBQ06Ca92SgR68wYSwep2rLT9cA5s/5PR6SxsGXk6Kt2ILGgCxhp 2lebbA9a5Yz3/0GYBtPteUZxsMMqzivd0Ono3CQkVspt9N70YhSm+GpYELS+27D7fzxF gF+4bTQdmSE4nZclynT+LQLXKcQmVvJ3TU8pOFRwb6bvOJ/zG6wNtx/U79ZvLIjiQasj iPE6dzTdcskWeEXHQ3MWZBEyjhHxdGZQNAyUprA53a8LxGHZSsaAykgjbjEIbBYbU6nz /qwL0vlm1vi6/EecaQM3nMBD18DxfRMylP2lyDmPNsIztLkBo12W/2AhyoPpxxU3w8v3 vITQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=LM12AAbQbcN8jk5JgwrivD46g7zPOEx2HbtCVudQgso=; b=o4ERtqfru3J6IEntiqaQm8H1yggfFiW8Do3eadlToWGA2yr1Zbm9+wZ1+wCHfn1z0s sbH5elf3A/Gs6Vn9sGb6qMi0BleF/IIGtAW0UMd+8hKbTxJqKb+m/+eh9rsAxA55qwnO O+LC4LTZ4LuaTGumR8pU8ENP0GZdZqy2xZSP3nW9nrVgnKUMLjxGDd0drPF5C+e0R6qb i0nvHUhexs54g6bT+aCdmgJ3VRbd+HDbtxf9iGzHQsVsEILdevtn9vjgWue68gXpc1WW rJguU2CA30Pzx5Q/Q8Q+A2RjJEqrOjer8RhSXdcFHiHUftbjZp0vBVpZuXg7ULH1uSer 97HA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukcuFfRo2Lg/waDKuH3GsuHRxORD3HfoU/K8lxhROBCQ18Nuz6AI nSz3QgaITPzw7M3bDYRdQas= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN7ptLkswTQ8E6Nu+RoyIn281oM7RcAhFLl7wfgfHrkRYC79ggakGA6ekTgW7CZT1NcmmZvJMg== X-Received: by 2002:a19:c413:: with SMTP id u19mr3484716lff.100.1547570931595; Tue, 15 Jan 2019 08:48:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from jonathartonsmbp.lan (83-245-233-163-nat-p.elisa-mobile.fi. [83.245.233.163]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s127sm726172lfe.8.2019.01.15.08.48.49 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 15 Jan 2019 08:48:49 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\)) From: Jonathan Morton In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 18:48:47 +0200 Cc: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <4D6E822B-A866-4513-90CF-93C6E6308F41@gmail.com> <9B8E2B07-BBDB-41A4-BA21-AB9B4CEFE075@gmail.com> To: Rodrigo Alvarez Dominguez X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1) Subject: Re: [Codel] Codel configuration X-BeenThere: codel@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: CoDel AQM discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2019 16:48:53 -0000 > On 15 Jan, 2019, at 11:27 am, Rodrigo Alvarez Dominguez = wrote: >=20 > At first test it seems cake is not limiting at 10000 kbit in a = mininet environment Are you measuring upstream or downstream of the bottleneck? As far as Cake is concerned packets are packets, but different protocols = perform congestion control differently (or not at all) resulting in = differences of send rate. Observations downstream of the bottleneck = should show Cake limiting throughput correctly. - Jonathan Morton