Re: [Codel] sprout

[Kathleen Nichols <nichols@pollere.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1120 bytes --]

Is that indeed what I think?

On Jul 10, 2013, at 1:46 PM, Jim Gettys <jg@freedesktop.org> wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Keith Winstein <keithw@mit.edu> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Jim Gettys <jg@freedesktop.org> wrote:
>>> Did you compare with fq_codel?  None of us (Van included) advocate CoDel by itself.
>> 
>> Hi Jim,
>> 
>> In our evaluation there's only one flow over the queue (in each direction) -- the videoconference. So, yes.
>> 
>> In the upcoming paper where we try and come up with the best end-to-end schemes for multiuser traffic, we compare against Cubic-over-sfqCoDel (http://www.pollere.net/Txtdocs/sfqcodel.cc).
> 
> Great.
> 
> I sure wish we could get together on *fq_codel variants.  Kathy thinks that there is no difference between sfq_codel and fq_codel, and Dave thinks there is a difference.
> 
> Sigh....
>                               - Jim
>  
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Keith
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Codel mailing list
> Codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3018 bytes --]