On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Keith Winstein <keithw@mit.edu> wrote:

On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Jim Gettys <jg@freedesktop.org> wrote:

Did you compare with fq_codel? None of us (Van included) advocate CoDel by itself.

Hi Jim,

In our evaluation there's only one flow over the queue (in each direction) -- the videoconference. So, yes.

In the upcoming paper where we try and come up with the best end-to-end schemes for multiuser traffic, we compare against Cubic-over-sfqCoDel (http://www.pollere.net/Txtdocs/sfqcodel.cc).

Great.

I sure wish we could get together on *fq_codel variants. Kathy thinks that there is no difference between sfq_codel and fq_codel, and Dave thinks there is a difference.

Sigh....

- Jim

Cheers,
Keith