From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Cc: Richard Scheffenegger <rscheff@gmx.at>,
"ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net"
<ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
"codel@lists.bufferbloat.net" <codel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
Cake List <cake@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Codel] [Bloat] The "Some Congestion Experienced" ECN codepoint - a new internet draft -
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 10:47:18 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1903111044210.3161@uplift.swm.pp.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2594F939-829A-443C-B1FE-2193F870E48B@gmail.com>
On Mon, 11 Mar 2019, Jonathan Morton wrote:
>> On 11 Mar, 2019, at 11:07 am, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote:
>>
>> Well, I am not convinced blowing the last codepoint on SCE has enough merit.
>
> I will make a stronger statement: I am convinced that blowing the last codepoint on L4S does *not* have enough merit.
... and I believe that blowing it on SCE doesn't have merit either.
That's the entire thing why I am opposing the use of ECT(1) unless we're
*really* *really* *really* sure there is something we want to blow it on.
Using it for SCE for me is marginal benefit compared to what ECT(1) could
be used for either. I think L4S is proposing enough novelty that it could
be used for that, but I'm open for other suggestions. SCE isn't enough.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-11 9:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-10 18:04 [Codel] " Dave Taht
2019-03-10 18:53 ` [Codel] [Cake] " Sebastian Moeller
[not found] ` <550C0248-1704-49DA-ABDC-49A91E0AC6F3@akamai.com>
2019-03-10 19:30 ` [Codel] [Bloat] " Jonathan Morton
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.20.1903110800310.3161@uplift.swm.pp.se>
2019-03-11 7:35 ` Richard Scheffenegger
2019-03-11 7:54 ` Sebastian Moeller
2019-03-11 8:59 ` Jonathan Morton
2019-03-11 9:07 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2019-03-11 9:10 ` Jonathan Morton
2019-03-11 9:47 ` Mikael Abrahamsson [this message]
2019-03-11 10:11 ` Dave Taht
[not found] ` <9C165094-DE2D-42AA-85F3-71760F01BD92@akamai.com>
2019-03-11 16:13 ` [Codel] [Ecn-sane] " Jonathan Morton
2019-03-11 7:43 ` [Codel] [Cake] " Sebastian Moeller
2019-03-13 4:39 ` David Lang
2019-03-10 21:11 ` [Codel] " Dave Taht
2019-03-10 21:28 ` Dave Taht
2019-03-10 21:49 ` Dave Taht
2019-03-10 22:37 ` [Codel] [Ecn-sane] " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-03-11 3:23 ` [Codel] " Michael Richardson
2019-03-11 3:26 ` Dave Taht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/codel.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1903111044210.3161@uplift.swm.pp.se \
--to=swmike@swm.pp.se \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=cake@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=chromatix99@gmail.com \
--cc=codel@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=rscheff@gmx.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox