From: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
To: ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Ecn-sane] L4S Last Call session
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 11:31:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0f2378ce-4bf3-8ba7-c122-b2eef614b89f@mti-systems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A8441BC-FC6C-48EC-9866-BB61E12BF7C2@gmail.com>
On 7/26/2019 11:08 AM, Jonathan Morton wrote:
> I thought it wise to note here, for the information of interested parties, that a hearing on L4S' WGLC will take place during the opening of today's TSVWG session. The discussion points raised in advance are summarised in these slides prepared by David Black:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/105/materials/slides-105-tsvwg-sessa-5-l4s-discussion-01
>
> Pete, Rod and I will of course be present, and we plan to raise several of these points in detail. I believe it is also possible to raise points from this list remotely. I think some people here are particularly interested in the final point on the list, about IPR.
>
> Please be civil…
I agree, anyone interested should participate. There is remote
participation available through:
http://www.meetecho.com/ietf105/tsvwg/
I just wanted to clarify a couple points (since I'm the document
shepherd assigned for the L4S suite at the moment):
- There has not been any working group last call yet on any of the L4S
documents, though we have a milestone to be trying to get there soon.
- We (TSVWG chairs) see some items coming up in discussions that look
like they'd block us from wanting to have a working group last call at
the moment. There may be a mixture of things that need more experiment
data, things that need revised text clarifications, other
misunderstandings, etc.
- The plan is to have open mic time in the working group to work through
these, and figure out how close or far we are from being ready for a
working group last call.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-26 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-26 15:08 Jonathan Morton
2019-07-26 15:29 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-07-26 15:31 ` Wesley Eddy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/ecn-sane.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0f2378ce-4bf3-8ba7-c122-b2eef614b89f@mti-systems.com \
--to=wes@mti-systems.com \
--cc=ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox