From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <4bone@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A52123B29E
 for <ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 21:32:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id x9Q1Ehm6058788;
 Fri, 25 Oct 2019 18:14:43 -0700 (PDT)
 (envelope-from 4bone@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net)
Received: (from 4bone@localhost)
 by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id x9Q1EgJo058787;
 Fri, 25 Oct 2019 18:14:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from 4bone)
From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <4bone@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
Message-Id: <201910260114.x9Q1EgJo058787@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw7xgbRqdbHaUDtXVGohVDnLNaGazGnLAX4OkKAG+FgfQw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 18:14:42 -0700 (PDT)
CC: ECN-Sane <ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net>
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: Re: [Ecn-sane]
	https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-even-iccrg-dc-fast-congestion-00#section-4.2.3
X-BeenThere: ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of explicit congestion notification's impact on the
 Internet <ecn-sane.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/ecn-sane>,
 <mailto:ecn-sane-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/ecn-sane>
List-Post: <mailto:ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:ecn-sane-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/ecn-sane>,
 <mailto:ecn-sane-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2019 01:32:55 -0000

> traction, of sorts.

Yes, but sadly they refered to the old version of the SCE I-D,
not the revised one that was presented in Montreal at IETF/105.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-morton-taht-tsvwg-sce/
vs
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-morton-tsvwg-sce/

If you follow the link in the references it takes you to
the old draft :-(.

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-morton-taht-tsvwg-sce-00
vs
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-morton-tsvwg-sce-00.txt

This also causes the datatracker to not show the references to
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-morton-tsvwg-sce-00.txt.

I'll contact the author about fixing the reference.
-- 
Rod Grimes                                                 rgrimes@freebsd.org