Discussion of explicit congestion notification's impact on the Internet
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
To: "David P. Reed" <dpreed@deepplum.com>
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>,
	"ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net" <ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	tsvwg IETF list <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Ecn-sane] [tsvwg] per-flow scheduling
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 23:14:06 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47796622-E118-4437-A5FD-C9DA766CB917@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1561405845.46329325@apps.rackspace.com>

> On 24 Jun, 2019, at 10:50 pm, David P. Reed <dpreed@deepplum.com> wrote:
> 
> My overall point here is that you seem to live in a world of academic-like purity - all TCP connections are essentially huge file transfers, where there are no delays on production or consumption of packets at the endpoint, there is no multiplexing or scheduling of processes in the endpoint operating systems, etc.

On the contrary, I've found that per-flow queuing algorithms like DRR++ cope naturally and very nicely with all sorts of deviations from the ideal, including for example the wild variations in goodput and RTT associated with wifi links.

These are exactly the kinds of complication that I imagine - and not merely in the abstract but through observation - that a pure end-to-end approach would have great difficulty in accommodating elegantly.

 - Jonathan Morton


  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-24 20:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-19 14:12 [Ecn-sane] " Bob Briscoe
2019-06-19 14:20 ` [Ecn-sane] [tsvwg] " Kyle Rose
2019-06-21  6:59 ` [Ecn-sane] " Sebastian Moeller
2019-06-21  9:33   ` Luca Muscariello
2019-06-21 20:37     ` [Ecn-sane] [tsvwg] " Brian E Carpenter
2019-06-22 19:50       ` David P. Reed
2019-06-22 20:47         ` Jonathan Morton
2019-06-22 22:03           ` Luca Muscariello
2019-06-22 22:09           ` David P. Reed
2019-06-22 23:07             ` Jonathan Morton
2019-06-24 18:57               ` David P. Reed
2019-06-24 19:31                 ` Jonathan Morton
2019-06-24 19:50                   ` David P. Reed
2019-06-24 20:14                     ` Jonathan Morton [this message]
2019-06-25 21:05                       ` David P. Reed
2019-06-24 21:25                   ` Luca Muscariello
2019-06-26 12:48             ` Sebastian Moeller
2019-06-26 16:31               ` David P. Reed
2019-06-26 16:53                 ` David P. Reed
2019-06-27  7:54                   ` Sebastian Moeller
2019-06-27  7:49                 ` Sebastian Moeller
2019-06-27 20:33                   ` Brian E Carpenter
2019-06-27 21:31                     ` David P. Reed
2019-06-28  7:49                       ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-06-27  7:53                 ` Bless, Roland (TM)
2019-06-22 21:10         ` Brian E Carpenter
2019-06-22 22:25           ` David P. Reed
2019-06-22 22:30             ` Luca Muscariello
2019-07-17 21:33 ` [Ecn-sane] " Sebastian Moeller
2019-07-17 22:18   ` David P. Reed
2019-07-17 22:34     ` David P. Reed
2019-07-17 23:23       ` Dave Taht
2019-07-18  0:20         ` Dave Taht
2019-07-18  5:30           ` Jonathan Morton
2019-07-18 15:02         ` David P. Reed
2019-07-18 16:06           ` Dave Taht
2019-07-18  4:31     ` Jonathan Morton
2019-07-18 15:52       ` David P. Reed
2019-07-18 18:12         ` [Ecn-sane] [tsvwg] " Dave Taht
2019-07-18  5:24     ` [Ecn-sane] " Jonathan Morton
2019-07-22 13:44       ` Bob Briscoe
2019-07-23  5:00         ` Jonathan Morton
2019-07-23 11:35           ` [Ecn-sane] CNQ cheap-nasty-queuing (was per-flow queuing) Luca Muscariello
2019-07-23 20:14           ` [Ecn-sane] per-flow scheduling Bob Briscoe
2019-07-23 22:24             ` Jonathan Morton
2019-07-23 15:12         ` [Ecn-sane] [tsvwg] " Kyle Rose
2019-07-25 19:25           ` Holland, Jake
2019-07-27 15:35             ` Kyle Rose
2019-07-27 19:42               ` Jonathan Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/ecn-sane.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47796622-E118-4437-A5FD-C9DA766CB917@gmail.com \
    --to=chromatix99@gmail.com \
    --cc=brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com \
    --cc=dpreed@deepplum.com \
    --cc=ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=tsvwg@ietf.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox