Discussion of explicit congestion notification's impact on the Internet
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	ECN-Sane <ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Ecn-sane] [Bloat] dropbox, bbr and ecn packet capture
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2020 03:52:15 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <85F248E2-E1B5-45A6-8E45-EBCA43B82A09@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw4dh8LrB=Pyq+SDY_npbCVonq+hXbHkLkGP0Pp=1ky2vg@mail.gmail.com>

> On 26 Apr, 2020, at 3:36 am, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I just did a rather large dropbox download. They are well known to be
> using bbr and experimenting with bbrv2. So I fired off a capture
> during a big dropbox download...
> 
> It negotiated ecn, my fq_codel shaper and/or my newly ath10k
> fq_codel's wifi exerted CE, osx sent back ecn-echo, and the rtt
> results were lovely. However, there is possibly not a causal
> relationship here, and if anyone is bored and wants to scetrace,
> tcptrace or otherwise tear this cap apart, go for it.

Well, the CE response at their end is definitely not Multiplicative Decrease.  I haven't dug into it more deeply than that.  But they're also not running AccECN, nor are they "proactively" sending CWR to get a "more accurate" CE feedback.  I suspect they're running BBRv1 in this one.

 - Jonathan Morton

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-26  0:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-26  0:36 [Ecn-sane] " Dave Taht
2020-04-26  0:52 ` Jonathan Morton [this message]
2020-04-26  3:10   ` [Ecn-sane] [Bloat] " Neal Cardwell
     [not found]   ` <mailman.79.1587870632.24343.bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
2020-04-26 23:33     ` Alexey Ivanov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/ecn-sane.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=85F248E2-E1B5-45A6-8E45-EBCA43B82A09@gmail.com \
    --to=chromatix99@gmail.com \
    --cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox