From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.taht.net (mail.taht.net [176.58.107.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D3243CB3F for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 22:37:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from dancer.taht.net (unknown [IPv6:2603:3024:1536:86f0:eea8:6bff:fefe:9a2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.taht.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3469621B1A for ; Thu, 26 Sep 2019 02:37:34 +0000 (UTC) From: Dave Taht To: ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net References: Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 19:37:20 -0700 In-Reply-To: (Ruediger Geib's message of "Mon, 16 Sep 2019 06:13:11 +0000") Message-ID: <87sgoj236n.fsf@taht.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Ecn-sane] [tsvwg] SCE-L4S Flent "bakeoff" tests - thanks X-BeenThere: ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of explicit congestion notification's impact on the Internet List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2019 02:37:35 -0000 I am looking forward very much to a rrul test on an asymmetric network conf= iguration. > -----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Nachricht----- > Von: tsvwg Im Auftrag von Pete Heist > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. September 2019 22:17 > An: tsvwg@ietf.org > Betreff: [tsvwg] SCE-L4S Flent "bakeoff" tests > > The following repo is now available with a set of Flent tests and > results comparing the behavior of SCE and L4S in six scenarios, five > that were discussed at the IETF 105 hackathon and a sixth more recent > one: > > https://github.com/heistp/sce-l4s-bakeoff/ > > The main README contains the details: > - info about the test setup > - the scenarios and links to results obtained in our Portland data center= , along with observations > - installation instructions, for the foolhardy > - current and future plans > > These tests cover the previously mentioned issue #17 (Interaction w/ > FQ AQMs), and raise a few more. I=E2=80=99ll gladly boil the observations= down > into a list if that helps. The plan is to iterate on these tests up > until IETF 106, to help provide the IETF and community with more > information regarding these two proposals. > > While the tsvwg mailing list can be used for discussion, if there are > specific action items for the tests themselves (corrections, new > tests, etc), those may also be submitted as issues on the repo > (https://github.com/heistp/sce-l4s-bakeoff/issues), so we can keep > track of them. > > Lastly, a technical detail, the currently posted run is missing its > associated pcap files due to a botched rsync, so I=E2=80=99ll start anoth= er > run and push that tomorrow. Meanwhile, the data files and plots are > still useful without those. > > Regards, > Pete Heist