From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.taht.net (mail.taht.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00:e000:2d4:f00f:f00f:b33b:b33b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BBFF3B29D for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 17:38:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from dancer.taht.net (unknown [IPv6:2601:646:8301:676f:eea8:6bff:fefe:9a2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.taht.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 540892286B for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 22:38:42 +0000 (UTC) From: Dave Taht To: ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net References: <158014090210.26587.12925021630999725769@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 14:38:40 -0800 In-Reply-To: <158014090210.26587.12925021630999725769@ietfa.amsl.com> (IESG Secretary's message of "Mon, 27 Jan 2020 08:01:42 -0800") Message-ID: <87wo98y3gv.fsf@taht.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Subject: Re: [Ecn-sane] [tsvwg] Transport Area Working Group (tsvwg) WG Virtual Meeting: 2020-02-20 X-BeenThere: ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of explicit congestion notification's impact on the Internet List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 22:38:43 -0000 IESG Secretary writes: > The Transport Area Working Group (tsvwg) Working Group will hold > a virtual interim meeting on 2020-02-20 from 10:00 to 12:00 America/New_York. > > Agenda: > 1. Agenda bashing (chairs - 5 min) > 2. Update on status and near-term plans for the set of L4S drafts (Bob? - 5 min) > - Chair request: Think about adding an explicit "Open Issues / Future Work" type of section in the architecture draft to consolidate a list of things still being worked in the context of TCP Prague and/or caveats and unknowns people should be aware of when deploying this Experimental work. > 3. Update on L4S & TCP Prague implementation, test, evaluation (Greg/Bob/Koen? - 15 min) > 4. L4S Issues List Discussion (goal is to see if we can agree on what more needs to be done on each issue to suffice for Experimental/Informational RFCs): > 4.1 Discuss status on (Bob - ~30 min): > #16 on classic ECN interaction > #21 CE codepoint semantics (closely related to #16) > #20 ECT(1) codepoint usage > 4.2 Discuss plans forward to address (Bob - ~15 min): > #26 on admission control > #27 on terminology > #22 on deployment feasibility > #24 on evaluation & testing results > 4.3 (We will try to handle the issues below by mailing list prior to the meeting) > If needed, discuss close-out of (~15 min): > #25 on IPR > #18 on loss detection in time-units > #23 on implementation status > #19 on the single codepoint > #17 on FQ interaction > 5. SCE Update (Morton/Heist/etc. - ~30 min) > > > Information about remote participation: > Remote participation information will be obtained at the time of approval. Plan to use IETF WebEx.