From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
To: ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: [Ecn-sane] Using the ECN bits as signalling for explicit congestion control
Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 21:37:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zhno25g0.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
This popped up in my Google scholar: "ABC: A Simple Explicit Congestion
Control Protocol for Wireless Networks" - https://arxiv.org/pdf/1905.03429
Basically, they propose an explicit congestion control mechanism that
uses signalling from the bottleneck router to slow down or speed up, and
they re-purpose ECT(0) and ECT(1) as the signalling mechanism. I do
believe the end result is rather similar to SCE, isn't it?
The appendix contains what appears to be an extensive stability
analysis.
-Toke
next reply other threads:[~2019-05-14 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-14 19:37 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2019-05-15 15:43 ` Rodney W. Grimes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/ecn-sane.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zhno25g0.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@toke.dk \
--cc=ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox