From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <toke@toke.dk>
Received: from mail.toke.dk (mail.toke.dk [IPv6:2a00:7660:6da:2001::664])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73EF23B2A4
 for <ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue, 14 May 2019 15:37:21 -0400 (EDT)
From: Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= <toke@toke.dk>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=toke.dk; s=20161023;
 t=1557862639; bh=v5ZWSML5Ry+qX7F67HUqs7rD1TqkqlCC0FD0/PPHD0Y=;
 h=From:To:Subject:Date:From;
 b=QNjwbDVXPRHmAn2pabAWffaZ0TxCUQlLzXEFFTramHzuM/EfN1EBT4d/JOFRWw8gq
 1YozllNqxGLY/be7t24KcFl3u8XMIRrr1rjAEizNiki2IAMsgerRhLSCsjUNNuxdYe
 dZaMJyBv8uK7v9PKa6wbEh4vu5eTafg4hv7jxQr8XlSmxehlr+jpJ4qb6lwsgJhOZj
 aUlN/zBR4J8VRR5hsscN09ZHDCKJyevMgmbgRNJrzXsIeOmZ57jd2P8r9mKdmjdbDB
 lm+2MWUdtXNzWTM9krIUi9uIV01Y12X5cjYuSYvhOiTJj43ByBGf6h+unTswc0+epj
 8ihwdleVpx5Lg==
To: ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net
Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 21:37:19 +0200
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
Message-ID: <87zhno25g0.fsf@toke.dk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Subject: [Ecn-sane] Using the ECN bits as signalling for explicit congestion
	control
X-BeenThere: ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of explicit congestion notification's impact on the
 Internet <ecn-sane.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/ecn-sane>,
 <mailto:ecn-sane-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/ecn-sane>
List-Post: <mailto:ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:ecn-sane-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/ecn-sane>,
 <mailto:ecn-sane-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 19:37:21 -0000

This popped up in my Google scholar: "ABC: A Simple Explicit Congestion
Control Protocol for Wireless Networks" - https://arxiv.org/pdf/1905.03429

Basically, they propose an explicit congestion control mechanism that
uses signalling from the bottleneck router to slow down or speed up, and
they re-purpose ECT(0) and ECT(1) as the signalling mechanism. I do
believe the end result is rather similar to SCE, isn't it?

The appendix contains what appears to be an extensive stability
analysis.

-Toke