Discussion of explicit congestion notification's impact on the Internet
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Ecn-sane] IPv5
@ 2021-03-31  7:16 Pete Heist
  2021-03-31 10:55 ` Vint Cerf
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Pete Heist @ 2021-03-31  7:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ECN-Sane

Since April 1 is upon us, I thought I'd let the list know that the ECN
debate has finally been resolved, pending a few details to work out...

IPv5
====

Codename: IP "Regret"

# Header Format

-----------------------------------------------------------------
|  Ver  |       Reserved        |   Protocol   |   Hop Limit    |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|         Payload Length        |          Flow Label           |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                               |
|                        Source Address                         |
|                                                               |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                               |
|                      Destination Address                      |
|                                                               |
-----------------------------------------------------------------

(Ver)sion (4 bits):
  Protocol version, set to 5

Reserved (12 bits):
  Reserved for fun, MBZ on open Internet

Protocol (1 byte):
  Protocol number as per IANA

Hop Limit (1 byte):
  As per IPv6

Payload Length (16 bits):
  Length of payload- fragmentation not supported

Flow Label (16 bits):
  Flow label- next to addresses for fast hashing

Source Address (8 bytes):
  64-bit source address

Destination Address (8 bytes):
  64-bit destination address

# Rationale

* provides more than adequate address space
* reduces IPv6 complexity
* reduces header size to 24 bytes, down from 40 for IPv6
* leaves 12 bits of header space for experiments and future use
* makes the Internet fun again



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [Ecn-sane] IPv5
  2021-03-31  7:16 [Ecn-sane] IPv5 Pete Heist
@ 2021-03-31 10:55 ` Vint Cerf
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Vint Cerf @ 2021-03-31 10:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pete Heist; +Cc: ECN-Sane


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2276 bytes --]

hang on! we deprecated IPv5 some time ago - this is a hijack!

v


On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 3:16 AM Pete Heist <pete@heistp.net> wrote:

> Since April 1 is upon us, I thought I'd let the list know that the ECN
> debate has finally been resolved, pending a few details to work out...
>
> IPv5
> ====
>
> Codename: IP "Regret"
>
> # Header Format
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> |  Ver  |       Reserved        |   Protocol   |   Hop Limit    |
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> |         Payload Length        |          Flow Label           |
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> |                                                               |
> |                        Source Address                         |
> |                                                               |
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> |                                                               |
> |                      Destination Address                      |
> |                                                               |
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Ver)sion (4 bits):
>   Protocol version, set to 5
>
> Reserved (12 bits):
>   Reserved for fun, MBZ on open Internet
>
> Protocol (1 byte):
>   Protocol number as per IANA
>
> Hop Limit (1 byte):
>   As per IPv6
>
> Payload Length (16 bits):
>   Length of payload- fragmentation not supported
>
> Flow Label (16 bits):
>   Flow label- next to addresses for fast hashing
>
> Source Address (8 bytes):
>   64-bit source address
>
> Destination Address (8 bytes):
>   64-bit destination address
>
> # Rationale
>
> * provides more than adequate address space
> * reduces IPv6 complexity
> * reduces header size to 24 bytes, down from 40 for IPv6
> * leaves 12 bits of header space for experiments and future use
> * makes the Internet fun again
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ecn-sane mailing list
> Ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/ecn-sane
>


-- 
Please send any postal/overnight deliveries to:
Vint Cerf
1435 Woodhurst Blvd
McLean, VA 22102
703-448-0965

until further notice

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3403 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 3992 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-03-31 10:56 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-03-31  7:16 [Ecn-sane] IPv5 Pete Heist
2021-03-31 10:55 ` Vint Cerf

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox