Discussion of explicit congestion notification's impact on the Internet
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Holland, Jake" <jholland@akamai.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>, Pete Heist <pete@heistp.net>
Cc: ECN-Sane <ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Ecn-sane] osx not doing ecn for me
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 18:41:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <C221E9AD-0060-4DF8-A21B-25F7A4F82144@akamai.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw5+iUZ_VDPagMbnFOv5Vh_7mtzjVx1YyKrr7VCvhTCnxQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Dave,

On 3/20/20, 9:25 PM, "Dave Taht" <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
> Going back to looking at this my devices... my mac rarely attempts ecn
> over ipv4 or ipv6 nowadays. It seems to fall back to not even trying,
> frequently. So for example on one rrul test on a local AP, it will
> successfuly try for all the connection, but on a subsequent test won't
> try at all or only try two or so. I sat down to look at it harder with
> the rrul test against various servers, today....
>
> There is a complex heuristic at work here that I do not understand.
> It's really hard to do science when you can't force it to always
> negotiate, but I guess it explains
> some of the complex data I have from the field where the attempts do
> not match the size of the deployment in any sane way.

They described at least some of the heuristics at maprg 98, and yes, they're
somewhat complicated:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKDgVSMUvis&t=32m22s

https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/98/materials/slides-98-maprg-tcp-ecn-experience-with-enabling-ecn-on-the-internet-padma-bhooma-00.pdf#page=5

I wouldn't be surprised if rrul tests will hit their thresholds more often
than a normal traffic pattern, that could be messing up your results.

I thought you could turn off the heuristics by fiddling with the right
sysctls, but I haven't tried to nail it down.

> This is osx high sierra 10.13.6.

Catalina has these, fwiw:

$ sysctl -a | grep ecn
net.inet.tcp.ecn_timeout: 60
net.inet.tcp.ecn_setup_percentage: 100
net.inet.tcp.ecn_initiate_out: 2
net.inet.tcp.ecn_negotiate_in: 2
net.inet.ipsec.ecn: 0
net.inet.mptcp.probecnt: 5
net.inet6.ipsec6.ecn: 0

It would not be surprising if they have changed it some since High Sierra.

Best regards,
Jake 


      reply	other threads:[~2020-03-21 18:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-09 21:18 Dave Taht
2020-01-09 21:41 ` Holland, Jake
2020-01-09 23:30   ` Pete Heist
2020-01-09 23:45     ` Dave Taht
2020-01-10  8:48       ` Michael Welzl
2020-01-10  9:41         ` Pete Heist
2020-03-21  4:23           ` Dave Taht
2020-03-21 18:41             ` Holland, Jake [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/ecn-sane.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=C221E9AD-0060-4DF8-A21B-25F7A4F82144@akamai.com \
    --to=jholland@akamai.com \
    --cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=pete@heistp.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox