From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qt1-x836.google.com (mail-qt1-x836.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::836]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19CEF3B2A4 for ; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 06:13:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-qt1-x836.google.com with SMTP id v20so9768555qtv.12 for ; Mon, 01 Apr 2019 03:13:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ajx1Sj7kN/KGztGVXrsd6RU/9zfeZNTwOMRji3mHXN0=; b=OOaYiEKc2J8wtX2MlT3gf2kgX38+cu5yb/B7gT9qr7exyuU/zzlp5C+csgNnuoViDK WreOkW6VIdkumfC73jnJp2j6WZJnxiDNG76SvgKD9eueywOazBRfJ4+fR65lhkCqpNdI BqR4nP0OxRWns3yrWaHPADbXN/dMphuhka9+n7gZNXHHk5Nq73CLqm0yRnPQYMynW4FE Ga1W+Z/OtOiSzq/StCkSPlYCshsgzUvidWosgZ5B5P0uc9K0EbrQwemQNd3xjhzDVLod GuetBIZyJ5UyooTCUFisA+IQhAbSwQUmcBoRk9CPThXwXjLkkw+bzCNFXpsSA5injzOR QB4A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ajx1Sj7kN/KGztGVXrsd6RU/9zfeZNTwOMRji3mHXN0=; b=hUrXTOqeTDzroFoVT/Da0vxKeyWiSiZH1C14T8/e2iYJ8wCkr53VXSRzp/1FI3Ezk3 2tXv7j1eliABZzo/KcByEfwQwX3ohRMFycDmN2NC659t4Pj6VNtG4bbBYZRIzUnDa7wi J1vmZk885qrwV4IUUM98bZdmtopBch2CbSPEmijYIaW83ITOOUxetyWftIrfTJHh7+Wf WsMt3xp3mEnwLagAAKaQe2q88kjp9jGhLDXbsVUJQ/yG9G8ggaQ6ZQqMLKqT3sszCJm3 p65BfdkOvmJok8Gix0mSCMVPjj8ZhFpc3wvcCKIr7sMCN7HPMCypmPIcNydbddlxohC0 ZNnQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV7J4T9DAZiqKNOjTNrb5T67n3jIdsjjcAZNI/BLeBFcidRfVsw zPjA3jqmk7O+glLvUnQ9JAEsUquzR6aYpXYc5WjH3ltm X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzoCuOTEyBz9zDz8CY9/NpC2yMHABk5A1QOYB1prc92FIY4Oj9Ra6fYku9OI0GO2/hX+KwBtlH9ijE50gopY68= X-Received: by 2002:a0c:94d0:: with SMTP id k16mr53389193qvk.158.1554113630628; Mon, 01 Apr 2019 03:13:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Dave Taht Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 12:13:38 +0200 Message-ID: To: Jeremy Harris Cc: ECN-Sane Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Ecn-sane] BBRv2 presentation in ICCRG video X-BeenThere: ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of explicit congestion notification's impact on the Internet List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 10:13:51 -0000 Yea, that's a mistake on the first set of graphs. look on the right side for the right numbers. On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 12:13 PM Jeremy Harris wrote: > > On 01/04/2019 10:58, Dave Taht wrote: > > Over the last week, jonathan, pete, and rodney (and jason?) also got a > > modified reno-style transport to > > respond properly to SCE: > > https://github.com/dtaht/bufferbloat-rfcs/tree/master/sce/results/proto= type1 > > was the first one > > Why are the throughput graphs annotated as "segment length"? > What are we really graphing? > -- > Cheers, > Jeremy > > > _______________________________________________ > Ecn-sane mailing list > Ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/ecn-sane --=20 Dave T=C3=A4ht CTO, TekLibre, LLC http://www.teklibre.com Tel: 1-831-205-9740