[Ecn-sane] tcp options processing - must should, don't care

Discussion of explicit congestion notification's impact on the Internet
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

* [Ecn-sane] tcp options processing - must should, don't care
@ 2020-04-05 22:48 Dave Taht
  2020-04-06  2:32 ` Rodney W. Grimes
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dave Taht @ 2020-04-05 22:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ECN-Sane; +Cc: oliver.hohlfeld

doesn't look like the ecn related bits were tested.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2002.05400.pdf

-- 
Make Music, Not War

Dave Täht
CTO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-831-435-0729

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [Ecn-sane] tcp options processing - must should, don't care
  2020-04-05 22:48 [Ecn-sane] tcp options processing - must should, don't care Dave Taht
@ 2020-04-06  2:32 ` Rodney W. Grimes
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rodney W. Grimes @ 2020-04-06  2:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dave Taht; +Cc: ECN-Sane, oliver.hohlfeld

> doesn't look like the ecn related bits were tested.
> 
> https://arxiv.org/pdf/2002.05400.pdf
> 

My guess would be because of "set of minimum TCP requirements that
any TCP speaker MUST implement."  Thus they did NOT look at IP,
nor did they look at SHOULD.  

Now with that said it would make a good paper to do the same
type of investigation for IP and as well extend the coverage
to SHOULD.

> Dave T?ht
-- 
Rod Grimes                                                 rgrimes@freebsd.org

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-04-06  2:33 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-04-05 22:48 [Ecn-sane] tcp options processing - must should, don't care Dave Taht
2020-04-06  2:32 ` Rodney W. Grimes

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox