* [Ecn-sane] fq_codel not-so-secret sauce in netduma's anti-bufferbloat implementation
@ 2019-04-11 15:40 Dave Taht
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Dave Taht @ 2019-04-11 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bloat, cerowrt-devel; +Cc: Iain Fraser, Luke Barlow, ECN-Sane
My understanding of netduma's implementation of "anti-bufferbloat" is
that it also does weird things with attempting to classify traffic,
and as far as I can tell, they still don't correctly compensate for
dsl or cable modem framing which is the root cause of some angst in
their forums. And I sure wish they's come clean about using RFC8290 in
their design, to me anyone that publicly states they are using
fq_codel is a mark of quality.... :) and I'd also like to know if the
have ecn on or off.
It was good, after all this time, to see this error message.
http://forum.netduma.com/topic/25802-qos-rpc-error-error_cmdfail-exec-tc-qdisc-add-dev-ppp0-parent-21-handle-3-fq_codel-failed-with-2/
--
Dave Täht
CTO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-831-205-9740
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2019-04-11 15:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-04-11 15:40 [Ecn-sane] fq_codel not-so-secret sauce in netduma's anti-bufferbloat implementation Dave Taht
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox