From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-il1-x132.google.com (mail-il1-x132.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::132])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B73C33B2A4
 for <ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Sun, 26 Sep 2021 16:08:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x132.google.com with SMTP id d11so16799810ilc.8
 for <ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Sun, 26 Sep 2021 13:08:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=LhL7MI8LAgs82iuOqajIXAwq87iLOOn9IXlj/aUXUTw=;
 b=hOfrqyB/o5Uhqt0IHM8Im/zPNodGAx6rmkIXka5j5uo+gCPTt7OjMS0KhtqbMBoxyp
 7Uswh+wM0pVaudoNstgO0aOJV3xyQLZE5OxcUU/YIa0Lw6JJnZXZSPygBlTUQa3Z1ajq
 dHLnCE6Pd8NGcEiO4qXRtaX3+5k/UxF3TKNMV4GzOWQx5fyMiRDPnm78YE49SRTIBt9T
 63+Xp0+b4nC1DKU+UYHsRgwPmPbmkgYswpZ+EonHA+thGbY4JkkhjZHpDyOSgvghZiXo
 jjrURVkehIOPmOKZI0cxFcpr7t+UlSPsv4PacgRtXWpb4FEgBZQlnHjaHXa/IDrw/DrG
 wp+A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=LhL7MI8LAgs82iuOqajIXAwq87iLOOn9IXlj/aUXUTw=;
 b=AZiKSoooiiG/4NRJy1R9iQ3WHbf6xwha5guC3YveJRU2+qkSAMfWkRcF6yq7crMBF7
 umYMH9F/c41krt3VLxWkIOkRX492cIQubZ8QyRDp60YxiWA9PEEqvobS55LMSTtuoCWH
 qFzCyu/QORPUj+foj81pNBIbamDMpLwrDsa2/RRkneVj75iNqbK8oy/4fYKCxq2rZcTY
 FbKDVHDb9sAGpyFXD+Q4kbojeKp/vUAC/KExD1qQkcENU8JBnmD+wKM0Wed32mk+uWiX
 nD6u3jSB+K7mEyU0Jiqjmf9rN+O03Mt6VTR14Y31ovU11itpL82jXX8XX7AAFH//z745
 kPnQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532vmk4kA3DPAZh6TpxH/mQ7GoSZKfedFgkijsLr9gXJOWZH9XCw
 yeXZE9rN870EiMiPYgH9aIl4c+ye8ebRPof7dBc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyz+BGaCxEw5aRgnuQHsblimmMxgTQlq55DjAO5EfyczEbiUwwLOXfusyyHUWONFv4tGoYLrBeuWmFirRipzG8=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1d83:: with SMTP id
 h3mr17127925ila.274.1632686922039; 
 Sun, 26 Sep 2021 13:08:42 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2021 13:08:29 -0700
Message-ID: <CAA93jw68BLggvcjqgYPmz8sdUsfMD2CpoMoKsQt3uz2HKmkT+g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Mohit P. Tahiliani" <tahiliani@nitk.edu.in>
Cc: ECN-Sane <ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [Ecn-sane] paper idea: praising smaller packets
X-BeenThere: ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of explicit congestion notification's impact on the
 Internet <ecn-sane.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/ecn-sane>,
 <mailto:ecn-sane-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/ecn-sane>
List-Post: <mailto:ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:ecn-sane-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/ecn-sane>,
 <mailto:ecn-sane-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2021 20:08:42 -0000

... an exploration of smaller mss sizes in response to persistent congestio=
n

This is in response to two declarative statements in here that I've
long disagreed with,
involving NOT shrinking the mss, and not trying to do pacing...

https://www.bobbriscoe.net/projects/latency/sub-mss-w.pdf

OTherwise, for a change, I largely agree with bob.

"No amount of AQM twiddling can fix this. The solution has to fix TCP."

"nearly all TCP implementations cannot operate at less than two packets per=
 RTT"

--=20
Fixing Starlink's Latencies: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Dc9gLo6Xrwgw

Dave T=C3=A4ht CEO, TekLibre, LLC