From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-io1-xd33.google.com (mail-io1-xd33.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d33])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 340473B29D
 for <ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Fri,  3 Jan 2020 09:44:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: by mail-io1-xd33.google.com with SMTP id v3so41558522ioj.5
 for <ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Fri, 03 Jan 2020 06:44:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=1SkHAyteKjLjasZh/t4OyCnphYevpbhC+BKdurVMS78=;
 b=C/d248cr871CY5oAl1yvY7xPGIZ1+anAFK8sDxwCvAE3qLH4XCWq+Niz0ZqtdW9zsp
 z5x2cInn6x0/xt3VSgO0bxCOqop8hA0NWWVYdGaA/A/w80PGC7fhzG5Q48RrZ62t1322
 txPOlQ8LqjadWQ0AJXqkySG6DzhMgihSjpm08Ebu21RUXi38vVWylIHCadCaW4kzsJwU
 BE2PAge/OlwNNFzhFb/x6YYGDlZmicvFykpXziMXOSe+o/DXb1zzlhcYlpB5awladiEq
 jUnVc8eFE/zXL32wqnXTyAgDfHWBCNey9MikQdWXlKJBDkHuan7XYCbDBUxWtMr2H9vx
 XYDQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=1SkHAyteKjLjasZh/t4OyCnphYevpbhC+BKdurVMS78=;
 b=JyoKZ8eD3oHT9+jNjr+zBW0lbo1Z9zBI0mgG2xVoLvXesX5UH72UtQ2Adq/GgOF7QF
 oK1MC2+5uiQfM9mJPHaWVRpZiB/mhkYPTZLvMDSCpZNqDjSQy2maRO2RZuuHHlWUPBpN
 Xj/t0RbESAIw/pftxOxAELWxNlT3WCNABVlEdoBirfdWMmVnM2Hkul53JYTzFpQ+tRmF
 qsGDWpU/QJcRliOHB8Estp8UUBRtkmZKIuc3kHQXMKaYUwWd7oThwNpPb3avyf29IUSp
 Reife839Nfgenf4kqIgigzwH8kie8welkZ0Qd60LCKVxAFoY3GnvT4GaFMUjkahX1uWM
 X0WQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUfVJtgCRpGryB266y4n4ZOPkCUR/wZRNh5pDmZARWmKhoZG9fo
 tKBpd0kUKW/rEEq8l4cOHNT8nBoD2t9ZQkIAua3lSQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzfQxumdJv8IdrZHiFhMnECUDfmd0+P0c4En0lb+kF7S73lN1MyXTqtmXc7A6ET6NtX+ixdjZIFf/w1GotnL1A=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:8901:: with SMTP id b1mr56189585ion.246.1578062694449; 
 Fri, 03 Jan 2020 06:44:54 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2020 06:44:43 -0800
Message-ID: <CAA93jw6nD4_bQowte48iZy2nJT-=V7yxER8D30Ccrrb5v297_w@mail.gmail.com>
To: ECN-Sane <ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [Ecn-sane] bbrv1 and ecn
X-BeenThere: ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of explicit congestion notification's impact on the
 Internet <ecn-sane.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/ecn-sane>,
 <mailto:ecn-sane-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/ecn-sane>
List-Post: <mailto:ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:ecn-sane-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/ecn-sane>,
 <mailto:ecn-sane-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2020 14:44:55 -0000

One of the things I'd forgotten about BBR is that if ecn is enabled on
the server, it still negotiates it e2e... and then ignores it in favor
of it's own model. (unless I did the test wrong, but the traces look
distinctly like BBR. This is the first time I've poked into BBR since
the arrival of EDF scheduling also)... fq_codel will mark like mad
(thank ghu for fq), the tcp receiver will send ecn-echo, and we do
pretty rapidly get a CWR out of BBR over fq_codel for wifi,
regardless, so it almost looks like it's actually responding to CE at
these low bandwidths.

--
Make Music, Not War

Dave T=C3=A4ht
CTO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-831-435-0729