Discussion of explicit congestion notification's impact on the Internet
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: ECN-Sane <ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: [Ecn-sane] osx ecn
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 19:03:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAA93jw7BEh0kyCopLC14GXRt8qZbF352p0pOLhSdjOJ8xew7gA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

netstat -sp tcp has all kinds of useful stats


        7174 client connections attempted to negotiate ECN

                4407 client connections successfully negotiated ECN

                2192 times graceful fallback to Non-ECN connection

                2053 times lost ECN negotiating SYN, followed by retransmission

??
                0 server connection attempted to negotiate ECN

                0 server connection successfully negotiated ECN

                0 time lost ECN negotiating SYN-ACK, followed by retransmission

                90 times received congestion experienced (CE) notification

                0 time CWR was sent in response to ECE

                3298 times sent ECE notification

                25 connections received CE atleast once

                0 connection received ECE atleast once

                830 connections using ECN have seen packet loss but no CE

                12 connections using ECN have seen packet loss and CE

                13 connections using ECN received CE but no packet loss

                9 connections fell back to non-ECN due to SYN-loss

                135 connections fell back to non-ECN due to reordering

                0 connection fell back to non-ECN due to excessive CE-markings



-- 

Dave Täht
CTO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-831-205-9740

             reply	other threads:[~2019-08-27  2:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-27  2:03 Dave Taht [this message]
2019-08-27  6:47 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2019-08-27  6:54   ` Michael Welzl
2019-08-27  7:02     ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2019-08-27 18:20       ` Dave Taht
2019-08-27 18:36     ` Dave Taht
2019-08-27 19:00       ` Michael Welzl
2019-08-28 23:29         ` Ryan Mounce
2019-08-28 23:45           ` Dave Taht
2019-08-29  0:55             ` Dave Taht
2019-08-29  3:28               ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2019-08-29  4:43                 ` Dave Taht
2019-08-29 10:30                   ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2019-08-29  8:08             ` Jonathan Morton
2019-08-29 10:39             ` Ryan Mounce
2019-08-27  6:58 ` Sebastian Moeller
2019-08-27  7:05   ` Jonathan Morton
2019-08-27  7:52     ` Sebastian Moeller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/ecn-sane.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAA93jw7BEh0kyCopLC14GXRt8qZbF352p0pOLhSdjOJ8xew7gA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox