Discussion of explicit congestion notification's impact on the Internet
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Ecn-sane] cwnd 4 in BBRv2?
@ 2019-03-28 17:09 Dave Taht
  2019-03-29  0:03 ` [Ecn-sane] [bbr-dev] " Neal Cardwell
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dave Taht @ 2019-03-28 17:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ECN-Sane, BBR Development, iccrg IRTF list

I just finished watching the sessions in ietf iccrg...

and although I have many questions about BBRv2, I am curious if the
cwnd in it is capped to a minimum of 4, not 2, still? BBRv1 is...

https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/net/ipv4/tcp_bbr.c#L385



-- 

Dave Täht
CTO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-831-205-9740

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2019-03-29  0:03 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-03-28 17:09 [Ecn-sane] cwnd 4 in BBRv2? Dave Taht
2019-03-29  0:03 ` [Ecn-sane] [bbr-dev] " Neal Cardwell

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox