From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-x333.google.com (mail-wm1-x333.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::333]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CF733B2A4 for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 05:22:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x333.google.com with SMTP id f17so52754567wme.2 for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 02:22:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ZvT7mZuFkcqY7yV+dCJtHw5YiHp1iVTCaMm8HblbRPY=; b=cHqmRHnq+QPcZrXQMosmc0PJaoasFPKrTiOaIQMisDNHodMDa7pk3sCd8VauExUtbg jUItL+sQjpr0BheaNIvyhR809Ize4x/CYcK6uJsSDUNElYAlAmViSCmrRvTUJNfNf0Dy 3x1XSW8OCgqPCFOYPvPWDpsaLf1vJDc1e25FdmVwHrzFzSGTVRcD1ypDf+HAixuFRmwr ee8UjFZv69s5zmq24o1wrwGQ6Cbs0NDgQohdmSeKxsnF0JzA1upOPIQB9idbZyKuvzrX dijOJPBDPixAGCF+XkuuNqpNJRSsqEVDxDq3pcfgkeU3XR69L+kz+9mwKUcD2duiRDOf EZ7Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZvT7mZuFkcqY7yV+dCJtHw5YiHp1iVTCaMm8HblbRPY=; b=ixWGms+3NGZZUZFF0yavAo+0ed4KWUN+jjxrGQNuNLnsf2KAMRYw0ajztaMlKO5P6T vRNWqK58mu7/vxqMRcegK1YdawbRYRJtbLu+n9zf3+1CFHAdgAv1QzNszHHlz9cXoxjj ApwYXdwc3J0hLAo4tDgBH6pSoftkWA3quUU6QoZ1/rfUJLW53FgH1STK5db7cLW7dlGO D2YXxUZe2UfAe4ilw2rV/Okh0YeOYqZdaQ3gzSCaLzACjtbUgY5zv1HTEEp5YdRRu5ME 6D+V7IoLW/NL48JRANMVGv/E3/2TH9Jf0VVNsHQwPOjV0ip4dNcr0lbCEcOqVfTewnF1 JVkg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW+xqandU5YEd3zWp8mBTBr+EfSemeqmUBpIY7czqmNbosH0+kA iVK1FAwnNJ00LVj8e0QNfUPbH+eoGhX6K5FBlbk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzQHXCElPi5QXgoXFk7SaJ1rliF1Dwtk9x7szekaEX00T9uW7ZQcykKi5iH13egSD0vHESUNhtsrPlpcMdXCMw= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:a186:: with SMTP id k128mr91292593wme.74.1564392152614; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 02:22:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a1c:9e09:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 02:22:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 2002:a1c:9e09:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 02:22:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Jonathan Morton Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 12:22:31 +0300 Message-ID: To: Dave Taht Cc: ECN-Sane Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008bca93058ece6e0e" Subject: Re: [Ecn-sane] simpler solution for ecn + cwnd < 2 than sub-packet windows X-BeenThere: ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of explicit congestion notification's impact on the Internet List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 09:22:33 -0000 --0000000000008bca93058ece6e0e Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" No, the single easiest solution is to reduce the pacing scale factors. The packets are still full size, but appear less often, potentially less than one per RTT. --0000000000008bca93058ece6e0e Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

No, the single easiest solution is to reduce the pacing scal= e factors.=C2=A0 The packets are still full size, but appear less often, po= tentially less than one per RTT.

--0000000000008bca93058ece6e0e--