From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEAC13B2A4;
 Mon,  1 Apr 2019 02:29:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501)
 id 8245BB1; Mon,  1 Apr 2019 08:29:32 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail;
 t=1554100172; bh=K+V2HfSAkmoFu7lIYb4NxTDGwLnY8uL6YOtVfi8ywuA=;
 h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=OQ9y+aRUIdvKKUCZvAYHlCh0UkcpXvYo3BT86a2bpcR8z8L8fRUvL26DRqEh2z5GE
 x9Zj4evVLaihiG04ZmEHZ4izVFLPc4q/J4vfQjVZrcY0Vp3ekErHA40DLp6F93dTe0
 ggOZUBTls3g8MERQqpZa4I0jHc3uthWc3xkNLN+0=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E5C6B0;
 Mon,  1 Apr 2019 08:29:32 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 08:29:32 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
cc: ECN-Sane <ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net>, 
 bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw5dO1_D1panFPNQnax5jRDPKn8NEvQE9zdE8HmVmujMBw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1904010827270.14375@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <CAA93jw5dO1_D1panFPNQnax5jRDPKn8NEvQE9zdE8HmVmujMBw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [Ecn-sane] any ideas to help solve tcp-prague's problems?
X-BeenThere: ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of explicit congestion notification's impact on the
 Internet <ecn-sane.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/ecn-sane>,
 <mailto:ecn-sane-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/ecn-sane>
List-Post: <mailto:ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:ecn-sane-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/ecn-sane>,
 <mailto:ecn-sane-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 06:29:34 -0000

On Mon, 1 Apr 2019, Dave Taht wrote:

> see:
>
> https://github.com/L4STeam/tcp-prague/issues/2

Just to comment that single-queue ECN-marking FIFO might not be available 
today, but if I get my way to get people to start configuring their 
existing equipment correctly, this would be a lot more common in the 
future.

A lot of devices do not currently have the "mark ECN" as option in their 
RED behaviour, but some do.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se