From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF79A3B29E for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 10:33:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id BD59FAF; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 16:33:09 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1554388389; bh=EyXoOISt8IEMvT3Vul8On3aZuWfYkp/FkCC3KpDqiwg=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=0Wds/kCaiXnjNu6XkFle2734TVKkhfEooLT2d2+Bf6/m7p5PhkDCVzbnllScO2o0V SxsyTRTHMq3JytNxt5+Xl7AqSIpJHLAZliA0zJke2kewKgBLCqj2k/rKC+EOAqtmYe jwUw7E0Vdg83TPPkXEwZ0NwEs2u5RGI5gRVNa7ps= Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBBF29F; Thu, 4 Apr 2019 16:33:09 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 16:33:09 +0200 (CEST) From: Mikael Abrahamsson To: Dave Taht cc: ECN-Sane In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) Organization: People's Front Against WWW MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Ecn-sane] where the l4s ect1 takeover is documented X-BeenThere: ecn-sane@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of explicit congestion notification's impact on the Internet List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2019 14:33:11 -0000 On Wed, 3 Apr 2019, Dave Taht wrote: > It's in: Appendix B.1 of: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-l4s-id-02#appendix-B.1 https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-aqm-dualq-coupled-08#section-2.3 https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-ecn-l4s-id-02#section-2.2 So while there perhaps could have been more up-front discussions, it's not THAT buried as you are implying. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se